Prognosis Based Definition of Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer: A Road Map to New Guidelines
- PMID: 32149822
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003859
Prognosis Based Definition of Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer: A Road Map to New Guidelines
Abstract
Objective: To identify objective preoperative prognostic factors that are able to predict long-term survival of patients affected by PDAC.
Summary of background data: In the modern era of improved systemic chemotherapy for PDAC, tumor biology, and response to chemotherapy are essential in defining prognosis and an improved approach is needed for classifying resectability beyond purely anatomic features.
Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database regarding patients diagnosed with PDAC from 2010 to 2016. Cox proportional hazard models were used to select preoperative baseline factors significantly associated with survival; final models for overall survival (OS) were internally validated and formed the basis of the nomogram.
Results: A total of 7849 patients with PDAC were included with a median follow-up of 19 months. On multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with OS included carbohydrate antigen 19-9, neoadjuvant treatment, tumor size, age, facility type, Charlson/Deyo score, primary site, and sex; T4 stage was not independently associated with OS. The cumulative score was used to classify patients into 3 groups: good, intermediate, and poor prognosis, respectively. The strength of our model was validated by a highly significant randomization test, Log-rank test, and simple hazard ratio; the concordance index was 0.59.
Conclusion: This new PDAC nomogram, based solely on preoperative variables, could be a useful tool to patients and counseling physicians in selecting therapy. This model suggests a new concept of resectability that is meant to reflect the biology of the tumor, thus partially overcoming existing definitions, that are mainly based on tumor anatomic features.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Comment in
-
Comment on "Prognosis-based Definition of Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer: A Road Map to New Guidelines".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e769-e770. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004291. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 32740258 No abstract available.
-
Response to the Comment on "Prognosis-based Definition of Resectability in Pancreatic Cancer: A Road Map to New Guidelines".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e770-e771. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004275. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 33074877 No abstract available.
References
-
- Street W. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Cancer Society; 2019.
-
- Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014; 74:2913–2921.
-
- Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–1210.
-
- Katz MH, Fleming JB, Bhosale P, et al. Response of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not reflected by radiographic indicators. Cancer 2012; 118:5749–5756.
-
- Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:2395–2406.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials