Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0230027.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230027. eCollection 2020.

Safety, prosthesis wearing time and health-related quality of life of lower extremity bone-anchored prostheses using a press-fit titanium osseointegration implant: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety, prosthesis wearing time and health-related quality of life of lower extremity bone-anchored prostheses using a press-fit titanium osseointegration implant: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study

R Atallah et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: We described safety and functional one-year follow-up outcomes of individuals with lower limb amputation treated with bone-anchored prostheses using titanium press-fit osseointegration implants.

Methods: All consecutive individuals treated between March 2015 and June 2018 with curved osseointegration femur implant (OFI-C) indicated for a long femoral remnant, gamma osseointegration femur implant (OFI-Y) indicated for a short femoral remnant, or osseointegration tibia implant (OTI) were eligible for this study. All adverse events were evaluated, infections were graded as follows: grade 1 and 2: low- and high-grade soft tissue infection, respectively, grade 3: deep bone infection, grade 4: septic implant failure. Functional outcome measures included prosthesis wearing time (PUS), health-related quality of life (GS), and the overall situation as an amputee (GS Q3); evaluated with the Questionnaire of persons with trans-femoral amputation (Q-TFA) before surgery and at one-year follow-up.

Results: Ninety of 91 individuals were included (mean age: 54±14 yrs, 26 females); treated with 53, 16 and 21 OFI-C, OFI-Y and OTI, respectively. Soft tissue infections (grade 1: 11 events, grade 2: 10 events) were treated successfully with antibiotics except in two (OFI-C and OFI-Y), who required additional surgery due to recurrent stoma irritation and peri-stoma abscess drainage. One individual with dysvascular amputation (OTI) developed septic implant loosening and occlusion of the femoral artery resulting in a transfemoral amputation. No aseptic loosening's occurred. One individual (OFI-Y) required stoma surgical refashioning due to soft tissue redundancy. At baseline mean ±SD and median (25th to 75th PCTL) Q-TFA PUS and GS were 52±39, 52(7-90) and 40±19, 42(25-50) and improved significantly to 88±18, 90 (90-100) and 71±15, 75 (67-83) at one-year follow-up. The GS Q3 improved over time.

Conclusion: Titanium osseointegration implants can be safely used within a one-year follow-up period. The performance improved compared to the use of a socket-suspended prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Henk van de Meent is a shareholder of OTN Implants BV Netherlands. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Preoperative planning and measurement of femoral remnant in OFI-C.
OFI-C: Osseointegration Femur Implant curved type, FL: Femur length.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Preoperative planning and measurement of femoral remnant in OFI-Y.
OFI-Y Osseointegration Femur Implant Gamma type, FL: Femur length.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Preoperative planning of tibial remnant in OTI.
OTI: Osseointegration Tibia implant, TL: Tibia length.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Schematic presentation of presurgical planning OFI-C.
OFI-C: Osseointegration femur implant curved type, DCA: Dual cone adapter, Heli connector produced by OTNInnovations.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Seal of intramedullary canal by drop-like shaped implant.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Dualcone adapter and internal locking screw.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Osseointegration implant connector (A: OTN connector, B: OPL/Hermle connector).
Fig 8
Fig 8. Participant flow diagram.
ILP: Integral leg prosthesis, OPL type B: Osseointegration prosthetic limb type B.

References

    1. Leijendekkers RA, van Hinte G, Frolke JP, van de Meent H, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Staal JB. Comparison of bone-anchored prostheses and socket prostheses for patients with a lower extremity amputation: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(11):1045–58. 10.1080/09638288.2016.1186752 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Branemark R, Branemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(2):175–81. . - PubMed
    1. Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Uden M, Branemark R. Socket versus bone-anchored trans-femoral prostheses: hip range of motion and sitting comfort. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005;29(2):153–63. 10.1080/03093640500238014 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hagberg K, Hansson E, Branemark R. Outcome of percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses for patients with unilateral transfemoral amputation at two-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2120–7. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.009 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leijendekkers RA, van Hinte G, Frolke JP, van de Meent H, Atsma F, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, et al. Functional performance and safety of bone-anchored prostheses in persons with a transfemoral or transtibial amputation: a prospective one-year follow-up cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(3):450–64. 10.1177/0269215518815215 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources