Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 20:11:67.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00067. eCollection 2020.

The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Affiliations
Review

The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Ernesto Bosch et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Societal changes and the increasing desire and opportunity to preserve fertility have increased the demand for effective assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and have increased the range of scenarios in which ART is now used. In recent years, the "freeze-all" strategy of cryopreserving all oocytes or good quality embryos produced in an IVF cycle to transfer later-at a time that is more appropriate for reasons of medical need, efficacy, or desirability-has emerged as an accepted and valuable alternative to fresh embryo transfer. Indeed, improvements in cryopreservation techniques (vitrification) and the development of more efficient ovarian stimulation protocols have facilitated a dramatic increase in the practice of elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET). Alongside these advances, debate continues about whether eFET should be a standard treatment option available to the whole IVF population or if it is important to identify patient subgroups who are most likely to benefit from such an approach. Achieving successful outcomes in ART, whether by fresh or frozen embryo transfer, is influenced by a wide range of factors. As well as the efficiency of IVF and embryo transfer protocols and techniques, factors affecting implantation include maternal aging, sperm quality, the vaginal and endometrial microbiome, and peri-implantation levels of serum progesterone. The safety of eFET, both during ART cycles and on longer-term obstetric and neonatal outcomes, is also an important consideration. In this review, we explore the benefits and risks of freeze-all strategies in different scenarios. We review available evidence on the outcomes achieved with elective cryopreservation strategies and practices and how these compare with more traditional IVF cycles with fresh embryo transfers, both in the general IVF population and in subgroups of special interest. In addition, we consider how to optimize and individualize "freeze-all" procedures to achieve successful reproductive outcomes.

Keywords: elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET); embryo cryopreservation; freeze-all; high responders; oocyte cryopreservation; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS); polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of FET cycles among all ART cycles reported by year in the United States (2005–2014; US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Adapted from Groenewoud et al. (18). FET, frozen embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization.

References

    1. Humaidan P, Polyzos NP, Alsbjerg B, Erb K, Mikkelsen AL, Elbaek HO, et al. . GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. (2013) 28:2511–21. 10.1093/humrep/det249 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. (2009) 26:347–54. 10.1007/s10815-009-9318-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banker M, Kotdawala A, Gupta R. The impact of vitrification in artificial reproductive technology programmes. Eur Med J. (2017) 2:82–9.
    1. Li H, Chian R-C. Mitochondrial dysfunction and age-related oocyte quality. Reprod Dev Med. (2017) 1:45–54. 10.4103/WKMP-0152.210693 - DOI
    1. Thomsen LH, Kesmodel US, Erb K, Bungum L, Pedersen D, Hauge B, et al. . The impact of luteal serum progesterone levels on live birth rates-a prospective study of 602 IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. (2018) 33:1506–16. 10.1093/humrep/dey226 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types