Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 18;7(1):e000389.
doi: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000389. eCollection 2020.

Prediction of prognosis and renal outcome in lupus nephritis

Affiliations
Review

Prediction of prognosis and renal outcome in lupus nephritis

Ioannis Parodis et al. Lupus Sci Med. .

Abstract

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of SLE, characterised by subendothelial and/or subepithelial immune complex depositions in the afflicted kidney, resulting in extensive injury and nephron loss during the acute phase and eventually chronic irreversible damage and renal function impairment if not treated effectively. The therapeutic management of LN has improved during the last decades, but the imperative need for consensual outcome measures remains. In order to design trials with success potentiality, it is important to define clinically important short-term and long-term targets of therapeutic and non-therapeutic intervention. While it is known that early response to treatment is coupled with favourable renal outcomes, early predictors of renal function impairment are lacking. The information gleaned from kidney biopsies may provide important insights in this direction. Alas, baseline clinical and histopathological information has not been shown to be informative. By contrast, accumulating evidence of pronounced discrepancies between clinical and histopathological outcomes after the initial phase of immunosuppression has prompted investigations of the potential usefulness of per-protocol repeat kidney biopsies as an integral part of treatment evaluation, including patients showing adequate clinical response. This approach appears to have merit. Hopefully, clinical, molecular or genetic markers that reliably reflect kidney histopathology and portend the long-term prognosis will be identified. Novel non-invasive imaging methods and employment of the evolving artificial intelligence in pattern recognition may also be helpful towards these goals. The molecular and cellular characterisation of SLE and LN will hopefully result in novel therapeutic modalities, maybe new taxonomy perspectives, and ultimately personalised management.

Keywords: lupus nephritis; outcomes research; systemic lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Anders H-J, Saxena R, Zhao M-H, et al. . Lupus nephritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:7 10.1038/s41572-019-0141-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Saxena R. Lupus nephritis. Am J Med Sci 2009;337:451–60. 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181907b3d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pons-Estel GJ, Serrano R, Plasín MA, et al. . Epidemiology and management of refractory lupus nephritis. Autoimmun Rev 2011;10:655–63. 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.04.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cervera R, Khamashta MA, Font J, et al. . Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Medicine 2003;82:299–308. 10.1097/01.md.0000091181.93122.55 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, et al. . Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;20:1103–12. 10.1681/ASN.2008101028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms