Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;8(3):40.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.96.

Can the preoperative nutritional risk score be a predictor of the outcomes in critically ill patients of lung transplantation: a retrospective study

Affiliations

Can the preoperative nutritional risk score be a predictor of the outcomes in critically ill patients of lung transplantation: a retrospective study

Kongmiao Lu et al. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) are nutritional risk screening instruments that are also used to predict the complications and morbidity after surgery. Our study aims to evaluate whether preoperative nutrition status at admission or postoperative nutrition treatment during admission for lung transplantation (LTX) was linked to clinical outcomes.

Methods: This study is a retrospective observational cohort study of 42 patients undergoing LTX. Using PNI and NRS-2002 screening instruments, patients were tested for dietary danger upon admission. Univariate and multivariate analyzes were performed to investigate the independent nutritional risk predictive value for post-operative complications, hospital length or intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality.

Results: Age, the average calorie intake, parenteral nutrition within 7 days, furosemide, the time of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV), postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) between survivor and non-survivor had a significant difference. Univariate analyses of death in LTX, age [HR 1.06 (1.00-1.13), P=0.04], the average calorie intake first 3 days [HR 0.99 (0.99-1.00), P=0.02], parenteral nutrition within 7 days [HR 0.20 (0.05-0.77), P=0.02], furosemide [HR 0.08 (0.01-0.76), P=0.02] and postoperative ECMO [HR 6.40 (1.65-24.77), P=0.00] were independent predictors for increased mortality. And multivariate analyses found that only postoperative ECMO [HR 9.59 (1.07-86.13), P=0.04] was independent predictors for increased mortality, whereas PNI and NRS2002 were not.

Conclusions: PNI and NRS2002 was not an independent predictor for post-operative mortality, and postoperative ECMO was only independent predictors for increased mortality in this study.

Keywords: Lung transplantation; NRS2002; critical illness; nutrition; prognostic nutrition index (PNI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of enrolled patients. NRS2002, nutrition risk score 2002; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.
Figure S1
Figure S1
ROC curve.

Comment in

References

    1. Mazurak VC, Tandon P, Montano-Loza AJ. Nutrition and the transplant candidate. Liver Transpl 2017;23:1451-64. 10.1002/lt.24848 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panchabhai TS, Chaddha U, McCurry KR, et al. Historical perspectives of lung transplantation: connecting the dots. J Thorac Dis 2018;10:4516-31. 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.06 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sierzega M, Niekowal B, Kulig J, et al. Nutritional status affects the rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 132 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:52-9. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.077 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003;22:415-21. 10.1016/S0261-5614(03)00098-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim CY, Kim SY, Song JH, et al. Usefulness of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index score as a predictor of the outcomes of lung transplantation: A single-institution experience. Clin Nutr 2019;38:2423-29. 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.10.027 - DOI - PubMed