Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;28(5):1525-1534.
doi: 10.1111/hsc.12975. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

Stress and well-being of unpaid carers supporting claimants through disability benefit assessments

Affiliations

Stress and well-being of unpaid carers supporting claimants through disability benefit assessments

Helen Foster et al. Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

This study assessed the subjective well-being and perceived stress of unpaid carers of disability benefit claimants. A total of 129 carers from the UK were surveyed between July and September 2017, using a cross-sectional design. Carers, who provided unpaid support to sick or disabled friends, family or neighbours in a non-professional capacity, reported here as unpaid carers, were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire comprising of the Perceived Stress-10-item Scale (PSS-10), the Personal Wellbeing Index-Adult (PWI-A), sociodemographic characteristics, the time they spent caring per day and the number of Personal Independence Payment and Work Capability Assessment interviews prepared for and attended by the person they cared for. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of the number of benefit assessments on stress and well-being scores, controlling for carers' sociodemographic characteristics and the time they spent caring. Analyses revealed that the number of times that claimants were exposed to benefit assessments significantly and negatively predicted unpaid carers' well-being and was positively related to their stress levels. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and hours supporting per day, benefit assessments predicted 8.1% of perceived stress and 4.3% of well-being variance. Being a female unpaid carer of a disability benefit claimant negatively predicted 7.5% of well-being variance. The results offered unique evidence of the negative psychological effects of disability benefit assessments upon unpaid carers, while adding to the evidence of female carers facing increased risks of psychological distress.

Keywords: personal independence payment; stress; unpaid carers; welfare reform; well-being; work capability assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97(1), 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129
    1. Adelman, R., Tmanova, L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. (2014). Caregiver burden a clinical review. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(10), 1052-1059. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.304
    1. Banks, J., Blundell, R., Bozio, A., & Emmerson, E. (2011). Disability, health and retirement in the United Kingdom. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Social security programs and retirement around the world: Historical trends in mortality, health, employment and disability insurance participation and reforms (pp. 41-77). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    1. Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson, D., Stuckler, D., Loopstra, R., Reeves, A., & Whitehead, M. (2016). 'First, do no harm': Are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(4), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206209
    1. Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson, D., Stuckler, D., Loopstra, R., Reeves, A., Wickham, S., & Whitehead, M. (2016). Fit-for-work or fit-for-unemployment? Does the reassessment of disability benefit claimants using a tougher work capability assessment help people into work? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(5), 452-458. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206333

LinkOut - more resources