Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;8(2):e00567.
doi: 10.1002/prp2.567.

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of eptinezumab in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine

Affiliations

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analysis of eptinezumab in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine

Brian Baker et al. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Eptinezumab is a humanized mAb that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide and is under regulatory review for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine (EM, CM). It is important to determine whether exposures achieved with intravenous (IV) administration of eptinezumab achieve desired pharmacologic effects. Population pharmacokinetics, including dose- and exposure-response analyses, were performed using patient-level data from the eptinezumab clinical trial program with IV doses ranging from 10 to 1000 mg in pharmacokinetic analyses or 10 to 300 mg in phase 2/3 clinical studies in patients with EM or CM. Exposure-response analysis explored the relationship between eptinezumab exposure metrics and efficacy parameters including monthly migraine days. The pharmacokinetic profile of eptinezumab was characterized by rapid attainment of maximum plasma concentration (ie, end of IV administration) and a terminal half-life of 27 days. Covariate analysis found that patient characteristics had no clinically significant effects on pharmacokinetic parameters and were insufficient to influence dosing. Dose- and exposure-response analyses found exposure with single doses ≥100 mg was associated with greater efficacy compared with doses ≤30 mg and a plateau of effect between 100 and 300 mg. A saturable inhibitory Emax model found the exposure over 12 weeks produced by single-dose eptinezumab 100 and 300 mg exceeded the exposure estimates required to achieve 90% of the maximal efficacy (EC90 ). This pharmacokinetic analysis of eptinezumab supports dosing every 12 weeks with no adjustment for patient characteristics, including exposures associated with 100- or 300-mg doses producing optimal efficacy effects. The similar efficacy profiles support 100 mg as the lowest effective dose of eptinezumab.

Keywords: CGRP; calcitonin gene-related peptide; drug dose-response relationship; eptinezumab; intravenous administration; migraine disorders; monoclonal antibody; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BB, BS, SP, and JS are full‐time employees of Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals. MB, IR, and MT have nothing to disclose. Within the past year, JS or an immediate family member held stock or stock options greater than 5% of the company or greater than $10 000 in value in Alder BioPharmaceuticals (now a part of H. Lundbeck A/S). JL and JS were full‐time employees of Alder BioPharmaceuticals (now known as Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals) at the time of study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of population pharmacokinetic (PK) model development of eptinezumab
Figure 2
Figure 2
Goodness‐of‐fit for final model of eptinezumab
Figure 3
Figure 3
Visual predictive check by study: (A) linear plots and (B) semi‐log plots
Figure 4
Figure 4
Geometric mean ratios (90% CI) for the effect of covariates on eptinezumab exposure at steady state (AUC0‐τ). For the continuous covariates (baseline MMD [MDBASE], body weight and CLor_cap) the minimum, 25th quantile, median, 75th quantile, and maximum values of the population are presented on the y‐axis. In addition, the typical body weight for an adult male (70 kg) was presented for the continuous covariate of body weight. On the right, the changes in exposure to eptinezumab are presented as median ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals. The dotted vertical line marks the AUC0‐τ for a typical patient (healthy female subject, weight = 70 kg; CLor_cap = 118 mL min−1, baseline MMD of 13 days). The effects of “test” covariates are presented relative to the aforementioned reference AUC0‐τ. AUC0‐τ, area under concentration‐time curve during a dosing interval (12 weeks) at steady state; CLor_cap, creatinine clearance capped at a physiological value of 150 mL min−1; CM, chronic migraine; EM, episodic migraine; MMD, monthly migraine days
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overall dose‐response relationship (A) and dose‐response relationship by disease status (chronic migraine vs episodic migraine; B). The solid lines with gray shaded area are smooth (loess) regression and 95% confidence interval. CM, chronic migraine; EM, episodic migraine; MMD, monthly migraine days
Figure 6
Figure 6
Exposure‐response relationship over weeks 1‐12. The solid line with gray shaded area is smooth (loess) regression and 95% confidence interval. AUC0‐12wk, area under the concentration‐time curve from time zero to 12 weeks; MMD, monthly migraine days
Figure 7
Figure 7
Exposure‐response relationship for secondary endpoints. (A) ≥75% migraine responder rate (weeks 1‐4) vs AUC0‐4wk; (B) ≥75% migraine responder rate (weeks 1‐12) vs AUC0‐12wk; and (C) ≥50% migraine responder rate (weeks 1‐12) vs AUC0‐12wk. For each quartile of eptinezumab exposure: Range, the minimum and maximum values; N responder, total number of subjects with a response; Total N, total number of subjects in each quartile of eptinezumab exposure; Proportion, N responder/Total N For each quartile of eptinezumab exposure: the minimum and maximum values are presented next to the distribution of exposure for each quartile of eptinezumab exposure. (A) Slope [95% confidence interval]: 0.428 [0.28922, 0.56589], P < .0001. (B) Slope [95% confidence interval]: 0.35367 [0.22059, 0.48675]; P < .0001. (C) Slope [95% confidence interval]: 0.36708 [0.2429, 0.4912]; P < .0001

References

    1. Deen M, Correnti E, Kamm K, et al. Blocking CGRP in migraine patients ‐ a review of pros and cons. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schou WS, Ashina S, Amin FM, Goadsby PJ, Ashina M. Calcitonin gene‐related peptide and pain: a systematic review. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell FA, King R, Smillie SJ, Kodji X, Brain SD. Calcitonin gene‐related peptide: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:1099‐1142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raffaelli B, Reuter U. The biology of monoclonal antibodies: focus on calcitonin gene‐related peptide for prophylactic migraine therapy. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:324‐335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schuster NM, Rapoport AM. Calcitonin gene‐related peptide‐targeted therapies for migraine and cluster headache: a review. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2017;40:169‐174. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances