Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 10;10(1):4394.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61357-9.

Predicting pregnancy test results after embryo transfer by image feature extraction and analysis using machine learning

Affiliations

Predicting pregnancy test results after embryo transfer by image feature extraction and analysis using machine learning

Alejandro Chavez-Badiola et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Assessing the viability of a blastosyst is still empirical and non-reproducible nowadays. We developed an algorithm based on artificial vision and machine learning (and other classifiers) that predicts pregnancy using the beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG) test from both the morphology of an embryo and the age of the patients. We employed two high-quality databases with known pregnancy outcomes (n = 221). We created a system consisting of different classifiers that is feed with novel morphometric features extracted from the digital micrographs, along with other non-morphometric data to predict pregnancy. It was evaluated using five different classifiers: probabilistic bayesian, Support Vector Machines (SVM), deep neural network, decision tree, and Random Forest (RF), using a k-fold cross validation to assess the model's generalization capabilities. In the database A, the SVM classifier achieved an F1 score of 0.74, and AUC of 0.77. In the database B the RF classifier obtained a F1 score of 0.71, and AUC of 0.75. Our results suggest that the system is able to predict a positive pregnancy test from a single digital image, offering a novel approach with the advantages of using a small database, being highly adaptable to different laboratory settings, and easy integration into clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparative chart of the best model for each database. The dbA and ALL databases obtained the best F1 score using the Support Vector Machine model, and the dbB database using the Random Forest model. AUC - Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the AIR E pipeline. Once the embryo image is taken, it is passed through Segmentation, Feature Extraction, Feature Selection, and Classification.

References

    1. Sciorio R, Thong JK, Pickering SJ. Comparison of the development of human embryos cultured in either an EmbryoScope or benchtop incubator. J. Assist. Reproduction Genet. 2018;35:515–522. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1100-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoshida IH, et al. Can trophectoderm morphology act as a predictor for euploidy? JBRA Assist. Reproduction. 2018;22:113–115. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gandomkar Z, Brennan PC, Mello-Thoms C. MuDeRN: Multi-category classification of breast histopathological image using deep residual networks. Artif. Intell. Medicine. 2018;88:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rebouças Filho PP, et al. Analysis of human tissue densities: A new approach to extract features from medical images. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2017;94:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2017.02.005. - DOI
    1. Tang Q, Liu Y, Liu H. Medical image classification via multiscale representation learning. Artif. Intell. Medicine. 2017;79:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.06.009. - DOI - PubMed