Mid-flexion stability in the anteroposterior plane is achieved with a medial congruent insert in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis
- PMID: 32157363
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05927-4
Mid-flexion stability in the anteroposterior plane is achieved with a medial congruent insert in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the intraoperative kinematics, especially for mid-flexion femorotibial anteroposterior (AP) stability, between newly developed medial congruent (MC) inserts and cruciate-retaining (CR) inserts in navigated cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA).
Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with varus osteoarthritis undergoing CR-TKA using an image-free navigation system were enrolled. AP kinematics, the AP translation under manual maximum stress to the knee joint at 45° flexion, rotational kinematics, and varus-valgus laxity were evaluated using a navigation system and statistically compared between the MC and CR inserts.
Results: AP kinematic analysis showed that the femoral position with the CR insert was significantly anterior at a maximum extension to 45° flexion compared with the MC insert (p < 0.05). The amount of AP translation at 45° flexion with the MC insert was significantly smaller than that with the CR insert (p < 0.05). Rotational kinematics found that the tibial position at maximum extension was significantly externally rotated with the MC inserts than with the CR inserts. Varus-valgus laxity was comparable between the MC and CR inserts.
Conclusion: The current results showed that greater mid-flexion AP stability was achieved with the MC inserts than with the CR inserts in CR-TKA. Intraoperative kinematics with the MC inserts more closely resembled those with preoperative conditions in CR-TKA.
Level of evidence: III, prospective comparative study.
Keywords: Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty; Intraoperative kinematics; Medial congruent insert; Mid-flexion stability; Paradoxical motion.
References
-
- Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2005) Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:172–176 - DOI
-
- Banks SA, Hodge WA (2004) 2003 Hap Paul Award Paper of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty: design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile-bearing knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 19(7):809–816 - DOI
-
- Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CEJ, Ranawat CS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS et al (1998) In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:47–57 - DOI
-
- Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB (2003) Conventry award paper: multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:37–57 - DOI
-
- Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:114–130 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
