Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;24(9):2703-2719.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02827-z.

What If My Dad Finds Out!?: Assessing Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men's Perceptions About Parents as Barriers to PrEP Uptake

David A Moskowitz  1   2 , Kathryn Macapagal  1   2 , Melissa Mongrella  1 , Leishla Pérez-Cardona  3   4 , Michael E Newcomb  1   2 , Brian Mustanski  5   6
Affiliations

What If My Dad Finds Out!?: Assessing Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men's Perceptions About Parents as Barriers to PrEP Uptake

David A Moskowitz et al. AIDS Behav. 2020 Sep.

Abstract
in English, Spanish

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy for high-risk adults and recently was given US FDA approval for use among adolescents. Yet, the barriers to medication uptake for this population are unique when compared to adult populations, as parents may be just as likely as prescribers to be gatekeepers to access. To better understand the role of parents in adolescents' attitudes towards PrEP, we surveyed 491 adolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM) ages 13-18, using forced choice and open-ended response questions. We measured perceived parent-PrEP supportiveness, hypothetical parent reactions to a request to initiate PrEP, and perceived positive and negative aspects of taking PrEP without parents knowing. A mixed-methods approach was employed. Results indicated a majority of AMSM had heard of PrEP and most reported their parents would be unsupportive of their taking PrEP. Teens perceived their parents would likely be angry, accusatory, and punitive if PrEP use was discovered, and that accessing PrEP independent of parents might increase their health autonomy, agency, and prevent awkward conversations about sex. Furthermore, a path model revealed that fears of parental reaction and poor self-efficacy to communicate with parents about PrEP significantly contributed to participants feeling PrEP was not "right" for them, and as a corollary, less interest in starting PrEP. The study suggests that improving parental knowledge of PrEP and encouraging parents to begin the conversation about PrEP could help increase uptake in AMSM.

El Profilaxis de preexposición (PrEP) ha sido aprobado por la US FDA como una estrategia efectiva para la prevención del VIH en adolescentes. Las barreras de esta población para el uso de PrEP son únicas, ya que padres y proveedores pueden controlar su acceso. Para entender mejor la influencia que tienen los padres en las actitudes de los adolescentes hacia PrEP, se llevó a cabo una encuesta con 491 adolescentes (–18) que tienen sexo con otros hombres. Medimos la percepción de apoyo parental hacia el uso PrEP, reacciones hipotéticas de los padres al enterarse de su uso y aspectos positivo y negativos de tomar PrEP sin el conocimiento de los padres. La mayoría de los adolescentes indicó haber escuchado de PrEP y que sus padres no los apoyarían si quisieran tomarlo. Los participantes reportaron que sus padres reaccionarían con coraje, acusaciones y castigos al enterarse del uso de PrEP. También reportaron que acceder a PrEP sin sus padres podría aumentar su autonomía, su agencia y prevenir conversaciones incómodas acerca del sexo. Un análisis de ruta reveló que el miedo a la reacción de sus padres y poca auto-eficacia para comunicarse con sus padres acerca de PrEP, contribuyen significativamente a que los participantes sientan que PrEP no es adecuado para ellos y tengan menos interés en comenzar a tomar PrEP. Nuestro estudio sugiere que mejorar el conocimiento de los padres acerca de PrEP y fomentar la comunicación entre padres y adolescentes acerca del mismo puede aumentar el consumo de PrEP en adolescentes que tienen sexo con otros hombres.

Keywords: Adolescents; Family communication; HIV prevention; Parents; PrEP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Path model of the relationships between AMSM-parent perceived reactions (normative beliefs) regarding PrEP and their direct and indirect effects on intending to start PrEP (behavioral intention).
The model (N=488) explains 27.0% of the variance, χ2(15) = 288.56, p<.001. CFI =.98. RMSEA estimate = 0.04, 90%CI = 0.00–0.07. Values along the arrows represent the direct standardized coefficients. Parenthesized values represent the standard error of the coefficients. For each indirect effect, we report the statistically significant indirect standardized coefficient (p<.05), the standard error, and the biased-corrected 95% confidence intervals based on 5,000 samples. a Indirect standardized coefficients were derived from the multiplication of the direct standardized coefficients within a path, from start to finish. ns = Not significant (statistically).
Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Path model of the relationships between AMSM-parent perceived reactions (normative beliefs) regarding PrEP and their direct and indirect effects on intending to start PrEP (behavioral intention).
The model (N=488) explains 27.0% of the variance, χ2(15) = 288.56, p<.001. CFI =.98. RMSEA estimate = 0.04, 90%CI = 0.00–0.07. Values along the arrows represent the direct standardized coefficients. Parenthesized values represent the standard error of the coefficients. For each indirect effect, we report the statistically significant indirect standardized coefficient (p<.05), the standard error, and the biased-corrected 95% confidence intervals based on 5,000 samples. a Indirect standardized coefficients were derived from the multiplication of the direct standardized coefficients within a path, from start to finish. ns = Not significant (statistically).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2017 2018 [updated November 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveil....
    1. Mustanski B, Moskowitz DA, Moran KO, Rendina HJ, Newcomb ME, Macapagal K. Factors associated with HIV testing in teenage men who have sex with men. Pediatrics. in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ybarra ML, Prescott TL, Phillips GL 2nd, Bull SS, Parsons JT, Mustanski B. Pilot RCT results of an mHealth HIV prevention program for sexual minority male adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140(1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macapagal K, Moskowitz DA, Li DH, Carrion A, Bettin E, Fisher CB, et al. Hookup app use, sexual behavior, and sexual health among adolescent men who have sex with men in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(6):708–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shannon CL, Keizur EM, Fehrenbacher A, Wood-Palmer D, Ramos W, Koussa M, et al. Sexually Transmitted Infection Positivity Among Adolescents With or at High-Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Los Angeles and New Orleans. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2019;46(11):737–42. - PMC - PubMed

Substances