Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;35(5):1413-1418.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05733-1. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

min-SIA: a Lightweight Algorithm to Predict the Risk of 6-Month Mortality at the Time of Hospital Admission

Affiliations

min-SIA: a Lightweight Algorithm to Predict the Risk of 6-Month Mortality at the Time of Hospital Admission

Nishant Sahni et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background: Predicting death in a cohort of clinically diverse, multi-condition hospitalized patients is difficult. This frequently hinders timely serious illness care conversations. Prognostic models that can determine 6-month death risk at the time of hospital admission can improve access to serious illness care conversations.

Objective: The objective is to determine if the demographic, vital sign, and laboratory data from the first 48 h of a hospitalization can be used to accurately quantify 6-month mortality risk.

Design: This is a retrospective study using electronic medical record data linked with the state death registry.

Participants: Participants were 158,323 hospitalized patients within a 6-hospital network over a 6-year period.

Main measures: Main measures are the following: the first set of vital signs, complete blood count, basic and complete metabolic panel, serum lactate, pro-BNP, troponin-I, INR, aPTT, demographic information, and associated ICD codes. The outcome of interest was death within 6 months.

Key results: Model performance was measured on the validation dataset. A random forest model-mini serious illness algorithm-used 8 variables from the initial 48 h of hospitalization and predicted death within 6 months with an AUC of 0.92 (0.91-0.93). Red cell distribution width was the most important prognostic variable. min-SIA (mini serious illness algorithm) was very well calibrated and estimated the probability of death to within 10% of the actual value. The discriminative ability of the min-SIA was significantly better than historical estimates of clinician performance.

Conclusion: min-SIA algorithm can identify patients at high risk of 6-month mortality at the time of hospital admission. It can be used to improved access to timely, serious illness care conversations in high-risk patients.

Keywords: data mining; hospital outcomes; palliative care; predictive models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Feature importance in the random forest models. The 25 highest-ranking features in the SIA model ranked by importance (as measured by the Mean Decrease in Gini Index). f48_ prefix refers to values obtained within the first 48 h of a hospitalization.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The receiver operator curve for the minSIA8 model.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Left panel: The recall plot shows the percentage of the overall number of cases in a given category “gained” (y-axis) when we apply the min-SIA8 and select the highest k-deciles (x-axis). For example, if the positivity threshold is set to be the highest-ranking 20% cases (by predicted probability), then 83% of true positives would be selected. Right panel: The accuracy plot plots the accuracy (y-axis) of the model at each decile threshold of predicted probability (x-axis).

Similar articles

References

    1. Curtis JR, Downey L, Back AL, et al. Effect of a patient and clinician communication-priming intervention on patient-reported goals-of-care discussions between patients with serious illness and clinicians: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:930–940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2317. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernacki R, Hutchings M, Vick J, et al. Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. You JJ, Downar J, Fowler RA, et al. Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:549–56. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7732. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson WG, Chase R, Pantilat SZ, et al. Code status discussions between attending hospitalist physicians and medical patients at hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:359–366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1568-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanson LC, Rowe C, Wessell K, et al. Measuring palliative care quality for seriously ill hospitalized patients. J Palliat Med. 2012;15:798–804. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0471. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources