Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;218(6):315-322.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.38.

Childhood intellectual disability and parents' mental health: integrating social, psychological and genetic influences

Kate Baker  1 , Rory T Devine  2 , Elise Ng-Cordell  3 , F Lucy Raymond  4 ; IMAGINE-ID consortium; Claire Hughes  5
Collaborators, Affiliations

Childhood intellectual disability and parents' mental health: integrating social, psychological and genetic influences

Kate Baker et al. Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Intellectual disability has a complex effect on the well-being of affected individuals and their families. Previous research has identified multiple risk and protective factors for parental mental health, including socioeconomic circumstances and child behaviour.

Aims: This study explored whether genetic cause of childhood intellectual disability contributes to parental well-being.

Method: Children from across the UK with intellectual disability due to diverse genetic causes were recruited to the IMAGINE-ID study. Primary carers completed the Development and Well-being Assessment, including a measure of parental distress (Everyday Feeling Questionnaire). Genetic diagnoses were broadly categorised into aneuploidy, chromosomal rearrangements, copy number variants (CNVs) and single nucleotide variants.

Results: Compared with the UK general population, IMAGINE-ID parents (n = 888) reported significantly elevated emotional distress (Cohen's d = 0.546). Within-sample variation was related to recent life events and the perceived impact of children's difficulties. Impact was predicted by child age, physical disability, autistic characteristics and other behavioural difficulties. Genetic diagnosis also predicted impact, indirectly influencing parental well-being. Specifically, CNVs were associated with higher impact, not explained by CNV inheritance, neighbourhood deprivation or family structure.

Conclusions: The mental health of parents caring for a child with intellectual disability is influenced by child and family factors, converging on parental appraisal of impact. We found that genetic aetiologies, broadly categorised, also influence impact and thereby family risks. Recognition of these risk factors could improve access to support for parents, reduce their long-term mental health needs and improve well-being of individuals with intellectual disability.

Keywords: Intellectual disability; carers; depressive disorders; genetics; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types