Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 15;8(1):1717030.
doi: 10.1080/20016689.2020.1717030. eCollection 2020.

Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health

Affiliations
Review

Understanding the global measurement of willingness to pay in health

Jean A McDougall et al. J Mark Access Health Policy. .

Abstract

Objective: To understand the different methodologies used to elicit willingness to pay for health and the value of a statistical life year through surveys. Methodology: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify studies using surveys to estimate either willingness to pay for health or the value of a statistical life year. Each study was reviewed and the study setting, sample size, sample description, survey administration (online or face to face), survey methodology, and results were extracted. The results of the studies were then compared to any published national guidelines of cost-effectiveness thresholds to determine their accuracy. Results: Eighteen studies were included in the review with 15 classified as willingness to pay and 3 value of a statistical life. The included studies covered Asia (n = 6), Europe (n = 4), the Middle East (n = 1), and North America (n = 5), with one study taking a global perspective. There were substantial differences in both the methodologies and the estimates of both willingness to pay and value of a statistical life between the different studies. Conclusion: Different methods used to elicit willingness to pay and the value of a statistical life year resulted in a wide range of estimates.

Keywords: Willingness to pay; cost-effectiveness threshold; health economics; literature review; surveys; value of statistical life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JAM, WEF, and BCMW are paid consultants to Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. JM is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical KK.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagram of search results

References

    1. Grosse SD. Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008;8(2):165–10. - PubMed
    1. Woods B, Revill P, Sculpher M, et al. Country-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further research. Value Health. 2016;19(8):929–935. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marseille E, Larson B, Kazi DS, et al. Thresholds for the cost-effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(2):118–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, Murray DB, Murray CJL, editors. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
    1. Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, et al. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making. 2000;20(3):332–342. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources