Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2293-2305.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15238. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Narratives of patient participation in haemodialysis

Affiliations

Narratives of patient participation in haemodialysis

Tone Andersen-Hollekim et al. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Aim and objective: To explore how working-age adults experience patient participation in hospital haemodialysis.

Background: End-stage kidney disease is a progressive, chronic condition imposing patients with high treatment burdens and low health-related quality of life. Patients face multiple medical decisions related to living with kidney failure. Given their frequent interaction with health services, patient participation may be of special value.

Design: Qualitative design with a narrative approach.

Methods: In 2018, eleven patients aged 35-64 years undergoing hospital haemodialysis participated in individual interviews. All interviews were analysed using a narrative approach. Reporting followed the Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines.

Findings: The patients' narratives of participation comprised three themes following their healthcare trajectory: Informed, but not involved in treatment choices; Duality of care and control; and Frail trust reflecting collaborative deficiencies. The patients received good information about dialysis, but were not involved in choice of treatment modality. Professional work, as well as the nature of treatment, contributed to restricted patient autonomy. Patients' trust suffered from collaborative deficiency generating delays in their treatment trajectories, and patients extended their responsibility into the coordination of transitions as a way of coping with these issues.

Conclusions: The study identified challenges related to patient involvement and interdisciplinary collaboration. Involving patients through dialogue and acknowledging their experiences, preferences and lifestyles may strengthen the mutual patient-professional understanding of treatment. Despite increased focus on seamless trajectories, patients face obstacles regarding interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination of health services.

Relevance to clinical practice: The findings indicate a want of individually customised care for people requiring dialysis. Patients need to be involved in the choice of treatment modality as well as decisions related to the current treatment. Information must include potential consequences of the different treatment modalities. Health services need to strengthen collaboration in order to secure treatment continuity and patient involvement.

Keywords: decision-making; healthcare trajectory; narration; patient participation; renal dialysis; working-age adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aasen, E. M., Kvangarsnes, M., & Heggen, K. (2012). Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00904.x
    1. Andersen-Hollekim, T. E., Kvangarsnes, M., Landstad, B., Talseth-Palmer, B. A., & Hole, T. (2019). Patient participation in the clinical pathway - Nurses perceptions of adults involvement in haemodialysis. Nursing Open, 6, 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.241
    1. Andreassen, T. A. (2018). Service user involvement and repositioning of healthcare professionals: A framework for examining implications of different forms of involvement. Nordisk Välfärdsforskning | Nordic Welfare Research, 3(01), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2018-01-06
    1. Angel, S., & Frederiksen, K. N. (2015). Challenges in achieving patient participation: A review of how patient participation is addressed in empirical studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(9), 1525-1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.008
    1. Armstrong, D. (2014). Actors, patients and agency: A recent history. Sociology of Health and Illness, 36(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12100

LinkOut - more resources