Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;15(7):1160-1169.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 8.

Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States

Affiliations

Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States

Pianpian Cao et al. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Annual lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for adults aged 55 to 80 years with a greater than or equal to 30 pack-year smoking history who currently smoke or quit within the past 15 years. The 50% who are current smokers should be offered cessation interventions, but information about the impact of adding cessation to screening is limited.

Methods: We used an established lung cancer simulation model to compare the effects on mortality of a hypothetical one-time cessation intervention and annual screening versus annual screening only among screen-eligible individuals born in 1950 or 1960. Model inputs were derived from national data and included smoking history, probability of quitting with and without intervention, lung cancer risk and treatment effectiveness, and competing tobacco-related mortality. We tested the sensitivity of results under different assumptions about screening use and cessation efficacy.

Results: Smoking cessation reduces lung cancer mortality and delays overall deaths versus screening only across all assumptions. For example, if screening was used by 30% of screen-eligible individuals born in 1950, adding an intervention with a 10% quit probability reduces lung cancer deaths by 14% and increases life years gained by 81% compared with screening alone. The magnitude of cessation benefits varied under screening uptake rates, cessation effectiveness, and birth cohort.

Conclusions: Smoking cessation interventions have the potential to greatly enhance the impact of lung cancer screening programs. Evaluation of specific interventions, including costs and feasibility of implementation and dissemination, is needed to determine the best possible strategies and realize the full promise of lung cancer screening.

Keywords: Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET); Lung and tobacco-related mortality; Lung cancer screening; Smoking cessation interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Screening eligibility by age and smoking status for birth cohorts 1950 (left) and 1960 (right) under the current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guideline.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative life years gained (left), cumulative lung cancer deaths averted (middle), cumulative deaths averted (top right), and deaths delayed (bottom right) with the probability of quitting being 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% under screening uptake of 30% for 1950 (top panel) and 1960 (bottom panel) birth cohorts. All results are presented per 100,000.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Heatmaps of life years gained (left), lung cancer death averted (middle), and deaths delayed by age of 80 years (right) under different assumptions of screening uptake (5%–100% with 5% increment) and the probability of quitting (0%–30% with 2.5% increment) for birth cohorts 1950 (top panel) and 1960 (bottom panel).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Key statistics for lung cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/non-small-cell-lung-cancer/about/key-stati... Accessed August 9, 2019.
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. - PubMed
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US). Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. - PubMed
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black WC, Gareen IF, Soneji SS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the national lung screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1793–1802. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types