Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States
- PMID: 32160967
- PMCID: PMC7329583
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.02.008
Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States
Abstract
Introduction: Annual lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is recommended for adults aged 55 to 80 years with a greater than or equal to 30 pack-year smoking history who currently smoke or quit within the past 15 years. The 50% who are current smokers should be offered cessation interventions, but information about the impact of adding cessation to screening is limited.
Methods: We used an established lung cancer simulation model to compare the effects on mortality of a hypothetical one-time cessation intervention and annual screening versus annual screening only among screen-eligible individuals born in 1950 or 1960. Model inputs were derived from national data and included smoking history, probability of quitting with and without intervention, lung cancer risk and treatment effectiveness, and competing tobacco-related mortality. We tested the sensitivity of results under different assumptions about screening use and cessation efficacy.
Results: Smoking cessation reduces lung cancer mortality and delays overall deaths versus screening only across all assumptions. For example, if screening was used by 30% of screen-eligible individuals born in 1950, adding an intervention with a 10% quit probability reduces lung cancer deaths by 14% and increases life years gained by 81% compared with screening alone. The magnitude of cessation benefits varied under screening uptake rates, cessation effectiveness, and birth cohort.
Conclusions: Smoking cessation interventions have the potential to greatly enhance the impact of lung cancer screening programs. Evaluation of specific interventions, including costs and feasibility of implementation and dissemination, is needed to determine the best possible strategies and realize the full promise of lung cancer screening.
Keywords: Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET); Lung and tobacco-related mortality; Lung cancer screening; Smoking cessation interventions.
Copyright © 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Impact of Joint Lung Cancer Screening and Cessation Interventions Under the New Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Oct 12. J Thorac Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34648947 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of integrating smoking cessation into lung cancer screening: a microsimulation model.CMAJ Open. 2020 Sep 22;8(3):E585-E592. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190134. Print 2020 Jul-Sep. CMAJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32963023 Free PMC article.
-
Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice.Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac076. Transl Behav Med. 2022. PMID: 36227937 Free PMC article.
-
Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1150-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29926. Epub 2016 Feb 24. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26916412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation Clinical Trials. SCALE (Smoking Cessation within the Context of Lung Cancer Screening) Collaboration.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 15;197(2):172-182. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201705-0909CI. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 28977754 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Lung Cancer Screening.JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1833-1842. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4942. JAMA Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34673885 Free PMC article.
-
Serum procalcitonin as a tumor marker in lung adenocarcinoma with ovarian metastasis: a case report.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jun 20;85(8):4100-4105. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001001. eCollection 2023 Aug. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37554879 Free PMC article.
-
Change in amount smoked and readiness to quit among patients undergoing lung cancer screening.J Thorac Dis. 2021 Aug;13(8):4947-4955. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3267. J Thorac Dis. 2021. PMID: 34527333 Free PMC article.
-
Uptake and 4-week quit rates from an opt-out co-located smoking cessation service delivered alongside community-based low-dose computed tomography screening within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial.Eur Respir J. 2024 Apr 18;63(4):2301768. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01768-2023. Print 2024 Apr. Eur Respir J. 2024. PMID: 38636970 Free PMC article.
-
Self-blaming as a barrier to lung cancer screening and smoking cessation programs in Italy. A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0318732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318732. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40043010 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Key statistics for lung cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/non-small-cell-lung-cancer/about/key-stati... Accessed August 9, 2019.
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. - PubMed
-
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US). Office on Smoking and Health. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous