Influence of Apical Preparation Size on Effective Conventional Irrigation in the Apical Third: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
- PMID: 32161880
- PMCID: PMC7006559
- DOI: 10.14744/eej.2018.06078
Influence of Apical Preparation Size on Effective Conventional Irrigation in the Apical Third: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between final apical preparation size and smear layer removal in the apical third using conventional irrigation in mandibular bicuspids.
Methods: A total of 66 extracted human mandibular bicuspids with comparable root canal morphology were equally divided into five experimental groups and a control group (n=11). Based on their experimental group, samples were instrumented up to size 25, 30, 35, 40, or 45 with 0.04 taper using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as the irrigant. Final irrigation was performed with 17% EDTA followed by 2.5% NaOCl. The control group was instrumented up to size 45/.04, and was irrigated with distilled water. Samples were sectioned buc-colingually, and they were qualitatively evaluated under scanning electron microscope for efficacy in smear layer removal. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were employed for statistical analysis.
Results: Statistical analysis revealed comparable removal of smear layer in the coronal and middle thirds of all experimental samples regardless of grouping. When using file size larger than 35, removal of smear layer in the apical third significantly improved (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between 40/.04 and 45/.04.
Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, using conventional irrigation, apical enlargement more than size 35/.04 is essential to enhance removal of smear layer at the apical third.
Keywords: Apical diameter; SEM; conventional irrigation; dentinal tubules; smear layer; sodium hypochlorite.
Copyright: © 2019 European Endodontic Journal.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures Conflict of interest: The authors deny any conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD.Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jan;21(1):76-80. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.224798. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018. PMID: 29411728
-
Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study.Int Endod J. 2019 Mar;52(3):343-351. doi: 10.1111/iej.13002. Epub 2018 Sep 14. Int Endod J. 2019. PMID: 30129186
-
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016. PMID: 27595725
-
Penetration Depth of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dentinal Tubules after Conventional Irrigation, Passive Ultrasonic Agitation and Nd:YAG Laser Activated Irrigation.J Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Spring;7(2):105-11. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.18. Epub 2016 Mar 27. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27330706 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Four Commonly used Root Canal Irrigants on the Removal of Smear Layer: An In-vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.J Int Oral Health. 2015 Sep;7(9):88-93. J Int Oral Health. 2015. PMID: 26435625 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/dj12030051. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38534274 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Final Apical Width on Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Xp Endo Finisher and Endodontic Needle: An Ex Vivo Study.Eur Endod J. 2020 Mar 17;5(1):18-22. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.58076. eCollection 2020. Eur Endod J. 2020. PMID: 32342033 Free PMC article.
References
-
- de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar:a systematic review. J Endod. 2010;36(12):1919–31. - PubMed
-
- Tan BT, Messer HH. The effect of instrument type and preflaring on apical file size determination. Int Endod J. 2002;35(9):752–8. - PubMed
-
- Wu MK, Barkis D, Roris A, Wesselink PR. Does the first file to bind correspond to the diameter of the canal in the apical region? Int Endod J. 2002;35(3):264–7. - PubMed
-
- Buchanan LS. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1:Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments. Dent Today. 1998;17(5):54–60. - PubMed
-
- Khademi A, Yazdizadeh M, Feizianfard M. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems. J Endod. 2006;32(5):417–20. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources