First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants
- PMID: 32163009
- PMCID: PMC7263438
- DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737980
First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants
Abstract
Background: Health researchers and health research participants support the sharing of research results; however, results are typically only shared through peer-reviewed publications. Few studies have investigated researchers' ethical concerns related to sharing results with research participants. Methods: An explanatory approach was used to explore the ethical concerns researchers may have with returning aggregate results to research participants. Researchers (N = 414) responded to an online survey of open-ended questions that allowed researchers to provide in-depth explanations regarding their responses to closed-ended questions. Results: Across researchers, the mean percentage of studies for which ethical concerns were reported as a barrier to results sharing was 38.5% (SD= 30.7). Researchers' primary ethical concerns with returning results were articulated as an overarching desire to prevent harm to participants. Three broad ethical concerns emerged, each with underlying subthemes: 1) distress, 2) understanding, and 3) privacy. Conclusions: This is the first study to broadly explore researchers' ethical concerns with sharing aggregate research results with participants and reveals that researchers' ethical concerns are closely tied to the ethical obligation to do no harm. In order to increase results sharing, steps must be taken to help researchers understand how to minimize potential harm when sharing results.
Keywords: Research dissemination; health research dissemination; research ethics; results sharing; survey.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019. PMID: 30832733 Free PMC article.
-
Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0183-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28376811 Free PMC article.
-
Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed.Trials. 2017 Oct 2;18(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2200-4. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28969665 Free PMC article.
-
What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239283. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32946521 Free PMC article.
-
Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms.BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Mar 28;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0359-9. BMC Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30922290 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness.Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):211. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020211. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35203974 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;30(9):1000-1010. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y. Epub 2022 Jun 15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 35705790 Free PMC article.
-
Return of aggregate results to study participants: Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 14;33:101136. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101136. eCollection 2023 Jun. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023. PMID: 37180845 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical considerations for sharing aggregate results from pragmatic clinical trials.Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):248-254. doi: 10.1177/17407745241290782. Epub 2024 Nov 25. Clin Trials. 2025. PMID: 39587730 Free PMC article.
-
Rural Research Network to engage rural and minority community members in translational research.J Clin Transl Res. 2023 Mar 28;9(2):115-122. eCollection 2023 Apr 28. J Clin Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 37179792 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baylor A, Muzoora C, Bwana M, Kembabazi A, Haberer JE, Matthews LT, Tsai AC, Hunt PW, Martin JN, and Bangsberg DR. 2013. “Dissemination of Research Findings to Research Participants Living with HIV in Rural Uganda: Challenges and Rewards.” PLOS Medicine 10 (3):4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001397. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Carpenter D, Nieva V, Albaghal T, and Sorra J. 2005. “Development of a planning tool to guide research dissemination” In Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 4: Programs, Tools, and Products), edited by Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES and Lewin DI, 83–91. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Prevention Research Centers.” accessed February 15, 2018 https://www.cdc.gov/prc/index.htm.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources