Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 12;10(2):597-636.
doi: 10.1002/cphy.c190023.

Effects of Perinatal Hyperoxia on Breathing

Affiliations
Review

Effects of Perinatal Hyperoxia on Breathing

Ryan W Bavis. Compr Physiol. .

Abstract

Air-breathing animals do not experience hyperoxia (inspired O2 > 21%) in nature, but preterm and full-term infants often experience hyperoxia/hyperoxemia in clinical settings. This article focuses on the effects of normobaric hyperoxia during the perinatal period on breathing in humans and other mammals, with an emphasis on the neural control of breathing during hyperoxia, after return to normoxia, and in response to subsequent hypoxic and hypercapnic challenges. Acute hyperoxia typically evokes an immediate ventilatory depression that is often, but not always, followed by hyperpnea. The hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) is enhanced by brief periods of hyperoxia in adult mammals, but the limited data available suggest that this may not be the case for newborns. Chronic exposure to mild-to-moderate levels of hyperoxia (e.g., 30-60% O2 for several days to a few weeks) elicits several changes in breathing in nonhuman animals, some of which are unique to perinatal exposures (i.e., developmental plasticity). Examples of this developmental plasticity include hypoventilation after return to normoxia and long-lasting attenuation of the HVR. Although both peripheral and CNS mechanisms are implicated in hyperoxia-induced plasticity, it is particularly clear that perinatal hyperoxia affects carotid body development. Some of these effects may be transient (e.g., decreased O2 sensitivity of carotid body glomus cells) while others may be permanent (e.g., carotid body hypoplasia, loss of chemoafferent neurons). Whether the hyperoxic exposures routinely experienced by human infants in clinical settings are sufficient to alter respiratory control development remains an open question and requires further research. © 2020 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 10:597-636, 2020.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adolph EF, Hoy PA. Ventilation of lungs in infant and adult rats and its responses to hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 15: 1075-1086, 1960.
    1. Ainslie PN, Ogoh S, Burgess K, Celi L, McGrattan K, Peebles K, Murrell C, Subedi P, Burgess KR. Differential effects of acute hypoxia and high altitude on cerebral blood flow velocity and dynamic cerebral autoregulation: Alterations with hyperoxia. J Appl Physiol 104: 490-498, 2008.
    1. Aizad T, Bodani J, Cates D, Horvath L, Rigatto H. Effect of a single breath of 100% oxygen on respiration in neonates during sleep. J Appl Physiol 57: 1531-1535, 1984.
    1. Al-Matary A, Kutbi I, Qurashi M, Khalil M, Alvaro R, Kwiatkowski K, Cates D, Rigatto H. Increased peripheral chemoreceptor activity may be critical in destabilizing breathing in neonates. Semin Perinatol 28: 264-272, 2004.
    1. Altman J, Bayer SA. Development of the cranial nerve ganglia and related nuclei in the rat. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 74: 1-90, 1982.

LinkOut - more resources