The impact of news exposure on collective attention in the United States during the 2016 Zika epidemic
- PMID: 32163409
- PMCID: PMC7067377
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007633
The impact of news exposure on collective attention in the United States during the 2016 Zika epidemic
Abstract
In recent years, many studies have drawn attention to the important role of collective awareness and human behaviour during epidemic outbreaks. A number of modelling efforts have investigated the interaction between the disease transmission dynamics and human behaviour change mediated by news coverage and by information spreading in the population. Yet, given the scarcity of data on public awareness during an epidemic, few studies have relied on empirical data. Here, we use fine-grained, geo-referenced data from three online sources-Wikipedia, the GDELT Project and the Internet Archive-to quantify population-scale information seeking about the 2016 Zika virus epidemic in the U.S., explicitly linking such behavioural signal to epidemiological data. Geo-localized Wikipedia pageview data reveal that visiting patterns of Zika-related pages in Wikipedia were highly synchronized across the United States and largely explained by exposure to national television broadcast. Contrary to the assumption of some theoretical epidemic models, news volume and Wikipedia visiting patterns were not significantly correlated with the magnitude or the extent of the epidemic. Attention to Zika, in terms of Zika-related Wikipedia pageviews, was high at the beginning of the outbreak, when public health agencies raised an international alert and triggered media coverage, but subsequently exhibited an activity profile that suggests nonlinear dependencies and memory effects in the relation between information seeking, media pressure, and disease dynamics. This calls for a new and more general modelling framework to describe the interaction between media exposure, public awareness and disease dynamics during epidemic outbreaks.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Global reaction to the recent outbreaks of Zika virus: Insights from a Big Data analysis.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0185263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185263. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28934352 Free PMC article.
-
Simple framework for real-time forecast in a data-limited situation: the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks in Brazil from 2015 to 2016 as an example.Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jul 12;12(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3602-9. Parasit Vectors. 2019. PMID: 31300061 Free PMC article.
-
Early detection of perceived risk among users of a UK travel health website compared with internet search activity and media coverage during the 2015-2016 Zika virus outbreak: an observational study.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 31;7(8):e015831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015831. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28860226 Free PMC article.
-
Zika Virus.Clin Lab Med. 2017 Jun;37(2):253-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Clin Lab Med. 2017. PMID: 28457349 Review.
-
Zika and Public Health: Understanding the Epidemiology and Information Environment.Pediatrics. 2018 Feb;141(Suppl 2):S137-S145. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2038B. Pediatrics. 2018. PMID: 29437046 Review.
Cited by
-
Poor attention: The wealth and regional gaps in event attention and coverage on Wikipedia.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0289325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289325. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37939022 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating digital and field surveillance as complementary efforts to manage epidemic diseases of livestock: African swine fever as a case study.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0252972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252972. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34972117 Free PMC article.
-
Collective Response to Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reddit and Wikipedia: Mixed-Methods Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e21597. doi: 10.2196/21597. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32960775 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiological methods in transition: Minimizing biases in classical and digital approaches.PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jan 13;4(1):e0000670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000670. eCollection 2025 Jan. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 39804936 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How social learning shapes the efficacy of preventative health behaviors in an outbreak.PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262505. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35015794 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC. Health information seeking in the digital age: An analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Social Sciences. 2017;3(1):1302785 10.1080/23311886.2017.1302785 - DOI
-
- Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2013;.