Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;9(10):3278-3286.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.2964. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Preliminary results of targeted prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging in evaluating the efficacy of a novel hormone agent in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Affiliations

Preliminary results of targeted prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging in evaluating the efficacy of a novel hormone agent in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Chang Liu et al. Cancer Med. 2020 May.

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging to make response assessment regarding novel hormone treatment and to predict the outcomes for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. This retrospective study enrolled 68 mCRPC patients who had daily received a novel hormone agent named abiraterone. Tc-99m PSMA single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) was performed at the baseline (SPECT/CT1) and after 3-6 months of treatment (SPECT/CT2). The treatment response was determined by visual analysis based on molecular imaging PSMA (miPSMA) scores framework and was compared with conventional biochemical analysis. We chose either the hottest lesion (target A) or five of the hottest lesions (target B) to calculate the tumor/background ratio (TBR) and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and compared their performances in predicting progression-free survival (PFS). Changes in PSMA expression between SPECT/CT1 and SPECT/CT2 were well associated with the results of the visual analysis. The TBR and the SUVmax of both targets were significantly associated with the baseline serum PSA level (P < .0001). The biochemical and radiological responses were concordant in 56 of the 68 patients (P < .001). The median PFS of the nonresponse group patients was significantly shorter than that of the patients in the response group (6.8 vs 12.1 months, P = .012). For predicting PFS, most of the indexes tested were significant on SPECT/CT2, with %ΔTBR being the most significant prognostic factor. Our preliminary results suggest that molecular imaging-targeted PSMA is of great value for treatment response assessment and clinical outcome prediction in mCRPC patients with long-term abiraterone treatment.

Keywords: PSMA; SPECT/CT; abiraterone; mCRPC; response assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlations between TBR (A, B) and SUVmax (C, D) of both targets and the serum PSA level
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 70‐yr‐old mCRPC patient with Gleason 4 + 5 who progressed after 20 months on traditional hormone treatment, and 8 docetaxel cycles of chemotherapy. PSMA imaging both before and after 12 weeks of abiraterone treatment showed a decrease in the miPSMA score of the bone lesions (A, red arrow). However, at week 12, there was a significant increase in the PSA and 2 new lesions on the bone scan (B, red circle). By weeks 20‐28, the PSA progression improved, and no additional lesions appeared on the bone scan, indicating that the progression seen at week 12 was due to PSA and a bone flare
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prognostic values of clinical risk factors and quantitative SPECT indexes in predicting progression‐free survival
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for PFS, according to a visual analysis. A, All patients; B, patients with an increasing PSA trend; C, patients with a decreasing PSA trend
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan‐Meier survival curves for PFS, according to %ΔTBR and %ΔSUVmax, for target A (A, C) and target B (B, D)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sridhar SS, Freedland SJ, Gleave ME, et al. Castration‐resistant prostate cancer: from new pathophysiology to new treatment. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):289‐299. - PubMed
    1. Fizazi K, Scher HI, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU‐AA‐301 randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):983‐992. - PubMed
    1. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fizazi K, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy‐naive men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (COU‐AA‐302): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):152‐160. - PubMed
    1. Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, et al. Trial design and objectives for castration‐resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1402‐1418. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228‐247. - PubMed

MeSH terms