Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May:223:48-58.
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Future research prioritization in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Affiliations
Review

Future research prioritization in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Marat Fudim et al. Am Heart J. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background: Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for some patients with heart failure and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), evidence gaps remain for key clinical and policy areas. The objective of the study was to review the data on the effects of CRT for patients with HFrEF receiving pharmacological therapy alone or pharmacological therapy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and then, informed by a diverse group of stakeholders, to identify evidence gaps, prioritize them, and develop a research plan.

Methods: Relevant studies were identified using PubMed and EMBASE and ongoing trials using clinicaltrials.gov. Forced-ranking prioritization method was applied by stakeholders to reach a consensus on the most important questions. Twenty-six stakeholders contributed to the expanded list of evidence gaps, including key investigators from existing randomized controlled trials and others representing different perspectives, including patients, the public, device manufacturers, and policymakers.

Results: Of the 18 top-tier evidence gaps, 8 were related to specific populations or subgroups of interest. Seven were related to the comparative effectiveness and safety of CRT interventions or comparators, and 3 were related to the association of CRT treatment with specific outcomes. The association of comorbidities with CRT effectiveness ranked highest, followed by questions about the effectiveness of CRT among patients with atrial fibrillation and the relationship between gender, QRS morphology and duration, and outcomes for patients either with CRT plus ICD or with ICD.

Conclusions: Evidence gaps presented in this article highlight numerous, important clinical and policy questions for which there is inconclusive evidence on the role of CRT and provide a framework for future collaborative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Overview of Prioritization Process
Abbreviations: CRT=cardiac resynchronization therapy; ESG=Evidence Synthesis Group

References

    1. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J et al. Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;350:2140–2150. - PubMed
    1. Cleland JGF, Daubert J- C, Erdmann E et al. The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352:1539–1549. - PubMed
    1. Gold MR, Thebault C, Linde C et al. Effect of QRS Duration and Morphology on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcomes in Mild Heart Failure: Results From the Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) Study. Circulation 2012;126:822–829. - PubMed
    1. Tang ASL, Wells GA, Talajic M et al. Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363:2385–2395. - PubMed
    1. Woods B, Hawkins N, Mealing S et al. Individual patient data network meta-analysis of mortality effects of implantable cardiac devices. Heart 2015;101:1800–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types