Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):318.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8397-2.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention to support integration of maternal, child and HIV care in primary health care facilities in South Africa

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention to support integration of maternal, child and HIV care in primary health care facilities in South Africa

Lyn Haskins et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Despite policies and guidelines recommending integration of health services in South Africa, provision of maternal and child health services remains fragmented. This study evaluated a rapid, scaleable, quality improvement (QI) intervention to improve integration of maternal and child health and HIV services at a primary health level, in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Methods: A three-month intervention comprised of six QI mentoring visits, learning sessions with clinic staff to share learnings, and a self-administered checklist aimed to assist health workers monitor and implement an integrated package of health services for mothers and children. The study evaluated 27 clinics in four sub-districts using a stepped-wedge design. Each sub-district received the intervention sequentially in a randomly selected order. Five waves of data collection were conducted in all participating clinics between December 2016-February 2017. A multi-level, mixed effects logistic regression was used to account for random cluster fixed time and group effects using Stata V13.1.

Results: Improvements in some growth monitoring indicators were achieved in intervention clinics compared to control clinics, including measuring the length of the baby (77% vs 63%; p = 0.001) and health workers asking mothers about the child's feeding (74% vs 67%; p = 0.003), but the proportion of mothers who received feeding advice remained unchanged (38% vs 35%; p = 0.48). Significantly more mothers in the intervention group were asked about their baby's health (44% vs 36%; p = 0.001), and completeness of record keeping improved (40% vs 26%; I = < 0.0001). Discussions with the mother about some maternal health services improved: significantly more mothers in the intervention group were asked about HIV (26.5% vs 19.5%; p = 0.009) and family planning (33.5% vs 19.5%; p < 0.001), but this did not result in additional services being provided to mothers at the clinic visit.

Conclusion: This robust evaluation shows significant improvements in coverage of some services, but the QI intervention was unable to achieve the substantial changes required to provide a comprehensive package of services to all mothers and children. We suggest the QI process be adapted to complex under-resourced health systems, building on the strengths of this approach, to provide workable health systems strengthening solutions for scalable implementation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04278612. Date of Registration: February 19, 2020. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Child growth; Child health; Growth monitoring; HIV/AIDS; Integrated care; Maternal health; Nutrition; Quality improvement; South Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comprehensive Package of Maternal, Child and HIV Health care. A description of integrated health care services health workers were expected to provide to mothers and babies at each visit to the clinic
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Description of Study Intervention. Outline of quality improvement intervention activities roll out in each sub-district

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Integrated Health Services - What and Why? Technical Brief No 1. 2008.
    1. Mounier-Jack S, Mayhew SH, Mays N. Integrated care: learning between high-income, and low- and middle-income country health systems. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(suppl_4):iv6–iv12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. South African Department of Health . Ideal Clinic South Africa. Ideal Clinic Manual. Version 18. 2018.
    1. Pillay Y, Barron P. The implementation of PHC re-engineering in South Africa. 2011.
    1. Haskins LJ, Phakathi SP, Grant M, Mntambo N, Wilford A, Horwood CM. Fragmentation of maternal, child and HIV services: A missed opportunity to provide comprehensive care. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2016;8(1):1240. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1240. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding