Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):312.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8434-1.

Randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of within versus across-category front-of-package lower-calorie labelling on food demand

Eric Andrew Finkelstein  1 , Felicia Jia Ler Ang  2 , Brett Doble  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of within versus across-category front-of-package lower-calorie labelling on food demand

Eric Andrew Finkelstein et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Several front-of-pack (FOP) labels identify healthier options by comparing foods within product categories. Alternative approaches label healthier options by comparing across categories. Which approach is superior remains unknown. The objective of this study was to test the effect of a within-category versus across-category FOP lower calorie label on 1) the percentage of labeled products purchased, 2) several measures of calories purchased (total, per dollar and per serving), and 3) total spending. We also tested the moderating effects of hunger and mood on purchasing patterns.

Methods: Using an online grocery store, we conducted a 3 × 3 crossover trial involving actual purchases with 146 participants randomly exposed to: 1) no labeling control; 2) within-category lower calorie labels, and; 3) across-category lower calorie labels. We labeled the 20% of products with the lowest calories per serving within or across categories. Purchases were compared using a fixed effects regression on first-differenced outcomes.

Results: Relative to the control condition, there was a 3 percentage point increase (p = 0.01) in labelled products purchased in the within-category arm and a non-significant decrease of 1 percentage point (p = 0.711) in the across-category arm. There was no significant difference in the proportion of labeled products purchased between the two labelling conditions. Neither strategy resulted in reductions in any measure of calories purchased or in total spending. When limited to beverages, there was a 398 cal reduction (p = 0.01) in the within-category arm and a 438 cal reduction (p < 0.01) in the across-category arm versus the control. Mood and hunger did not modify the effects for either strategy.

Conclusions: Results provide evidence that both labelling strategies have the potential to influence food purchasing patterns. However, we cannot definitely state that one labelling approach is superior or even that an increase in the proportion of labelled products purchased will lead to a reduction in calories purchased.

Trial registration: The American Economic Association's registry for randomized controlled trials, RCT ID: AEARCTR-0002325; Prospectively Registered October 06, 2017. In compliance with ICMJE policy, the trial was also registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, RCT ID: [NCT04165447]. Retrospectively Registered 11 November 2019.

Keywords: Calories; Food intake; Front-of-pack labeling; Nutrition labeling; Online grocery store.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
‘Lower Calorie’ logo used in the LoCal study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of ‘Lower Calorie’ products as they appeared on NUSMart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CONSORT Flow Diagram for participant recruitment and randomization
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Popkin BM, Adair LS, Ng SW. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(1):3–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00456.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagner K-H, Brath H. A global view on the development of non communicable diseases. Prev Med. 2012;54:S38–S41. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, Levy D, Carter R, Mabry PL, Finegood DT, Huang T, Marsh T, Moodie ML. Changing the future of obesity: science, policy, and action. Lancet (London, England). 2011;378(9793):838–47. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60815-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popkin BM, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(2):174–186. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00419-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkes C, Smith TG, Jewell J, Wardle J, Hammond RA, Friel S, Kain J. Smart food policies for obesity prevention. The Lancet. 2015;385(9985):2410–21. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data