Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):197.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5033-x.

Understanding the conditions that influence the roles of midwives in Ontario, Canada's health system: an embedded single-case study

Cristina A Mattison  1 , John N Lavis  2 , Eileen K Hutton  3 , Michelle L Dion  4 , Michael G Wilson  2
Affiliations

Understanding the conditions that influence the roles of midwives in Ontario, Canada's health system: an embedded single-case study

Cristina A Mattison et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the significant variability in the role and integration of midwifery across provincial and territorial health systems, there has been limited scholarly inquiry into whether, how and under what conditions midwifery has been assigned roles and integrated into Canada's health systems.

Methods: We use Yin's (2014) embedded single-case study design, which allows for an in-depth exploration to qualitatively assess how, since the regulation of midwives in 1994, the Ontario health system has assigned roles to and integrated midwives as a service delivery option. Kingdon's agenda setting and 3i + E theoretical frameworks are used to analyze two recent key policy directions (decision to fund freestanding midwifery-led birth centres and the Patients First primary care reform) that presented opportunities for the integration of midwives into the health system. Data were collected from key informant interviews and documents.

Results: Nineteen key informant interviews were conducted, and 50 documents were reviewed in addition to field notes taken during the interviews. Our findings suggest that while midwifery was created as a self-regulated profession in 1994, health-system transformation initiatives have restricted the profession's integration into Ontario's health system. The policy legacies of how past decisions influence the decisions possible today have the most explanatory power to understand why midwives have had limited integration into interprofessional maternity care. The most important policy legacies to emerge from the analyses were related to payment mechanisms. In the medical model, payment mechanisms privilege physician-provided and hospital-based services, while payment mechanisms in the midwifery model have imposed unintended restrictions on the profession's ability to practice in interprofessional environments.

Conclusions: This is the first study to explain why midwives have not been fully integrated into the Ontario health system, as well as the limitations placed on their roles and scope of practice. The study also builds a theoretical understanding of the integration process of healthcare professions within health systems and how policy legacies shape service delivery options.

Keywords: Canada; Case study; Health systems; Midwifery; Ontario; Political systems; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Embedded single-case study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Analytic approach using Kingdon’s agenda setting and 3i + E theoretical frameworks
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bourgeault IL. Delivering the ‘new’ Canadian midwifery: the impact on midwifery of integration into the Ontario health care system. Sociol Health Illn. 2000;22(2):172–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00198. - DOI
    1. Bourgeault IL, Benoit C, Davis-Floyd R. Reconceiving midwifery. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP; 2004.
    1. Adams TL, Bourgeault IL. Feminism and women's health professions in Ontario. Women Health. 2004;38(4):73–90. doi: 10.1300/J013v38n04_05. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paterson S. Feminizing obstetrics or medicalizing midwifery? The discursive constitution of midwifery in Ontario, Canada. Crit Policy Stud. 2010;4(2):127–145. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2010.490635. - DOI
    1. Rushing B. Ideology in the reemergence of north American midwifery. Work Occup. 1993;20(1):46–67. doi: 10.1177/0730888493020001003. - DOI