Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e030164.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030164.

MEMPHIS: a smartphone app using psychological approaches for women with chronic pelvic pain presenting to gynaecology clinics: a randomised feasibility trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

MEMPHIS: a smartphone app using psychological approaches for women with chronic pelvic pain presenting to gynaecology clinics: a randomised feasibility trial

Gordon Forbes et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial of a modified, pre-existing, mindfulness meditation smartphone app for women with chronic pelvic pain.

Design: Three arm randomised feasibility trial.

Setting: Women were recruited at two gynaecology clinics in the UK. Interventions were delivered via smartphone or computer at a location of participants choosing.

Participants: Women were eligible for the study if they were over 18, had been experiencing organic or non-organic chronic pelvic pain for 6 months or more, and had access to a computer or smartphone. 90 women were randomised.

Interventions: Daily mindfulness meditation delivered by smartphone app, an active control app which delivered muscle relaxation techniques, and usual care without app. Interventions were delivered over 60 days.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Outcomes included length of recruitment, follow-up rates, adherence to the app interventions, and clinical outcomes measured at baseline, two, three and 6 months.

Results: The target sample size was recruited in 145 days. Adherence to the app interventions was extremely low (mean app use 1.8 days mindfulness meditation group, 7.0 days active control). Fifty-seven (63%) women completed 6-month follow-up, and 75 (83%) women completed at least one postrandomisation follow-up. The 95% CIs for clinical outcomes were consistent with no benefit from the mindfulness meditation app; for example, mean differences in pain acceptance scores at 60 days (higher scores are better) were -2.3 (mindfulness meditation vs usual care, 95% CI: -6.6 to 2.0) and -4.0 (mindfulness meditation vs active control, 95% CI: -8.1 to 0.1).

Conclusions: Despite high recruitment and adequate follow-up rates, demonstrating feasibility, the extremely low adherence suggests a definitive randomised trial of the mindfulness meditation app used in this study is not warranted. Future research should focus on improving patient engagement.

Trial registration numbers: NCT02721108; ISRCTN10925965; Results.

Keywords: Randomised controlled trial; chronic pain; meditation; mindfulness; mobile applications; pelvic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Daily app use (defined as completing >90% of a session) within 60 days of randomisation in the intervention and active control groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean (95% CI) chronic pain acceptance score (CPAQ) and estimated treatment effect (95% CI) at each follow-up time point (CPAQ). Higher scores indicate better health outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, et al. . WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006;6:177 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. . Chronic pelvic pain in the community--symptoms, investigations, and diagnoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1149–55. 10.1067/mob.2001.112904 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daniels JP, Khan KS. Chronic pelvic pain in women. BMJ 2010;341:c4834 10.1136/bmj.c4834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore SJ KS. Green Top Guideline No 41: the initial management of Chronic Pelvic Pain : Gynaecologists TrcoOa. In, 2012.
    1. Peters AA, van Dorst E, Jellis B, et al. . A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:740–4. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data