Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 5:2:2398212818817498.
doi: 10.1177/2398212818817498. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

The development of antipsychotic drugs

Affiliations
Review

The development of antipsychotic drugs

David Cunningham Owens et al. Brain Neurosci Adv. .

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs revolutionised psychiatric practice and provided a range of tools for exploring brain function in health and disease. Their development and introduction were largely empirical but based on long and honourable scientific credentials and remarkable powers of clinical observation. The class shares a common core action of attenuating central dopamine transmission, which underlies the major limitation to their use - high liability to disrupt extrapyramidal function - and also the most durable hypothesis of the basis of psychotic disorders, especially schizophrenia. However, the Dopamine Hypothesis, which has driven drug development for almost half a century, has become a straight-jacket, stifling innovation, resulting in a class of compounds that are largely derivative. Recent efforts only cemented this tendency as no clinical evidence supports the notion that newer compounds, modelled on clozapine, share that drug's unique neurological tolerability and can be considered 'atypical'. Patients and doctors alike must await a more profound understanding of central dopamine homeostasis and novel methods of maintaining it before they can again experience the intoxicating promise antipsychotics once held.

Keywords: Antipsychotics; atypical antipsychotics; clozapine; dopamine; extrapyramidal side-effects; pharma investment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Antipsychotic drugs: schematic representation of some receptor-binding profiles (percentages of total binding: for method of calculation, see Hyttel et al., 1984 and Goldstein, 2000).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlsson A, Lindquist M. (1963) The effect of chlorpromazine or haloperidol on formation of 3-methoxytyramine and noradrenaline in mouse brain. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica 20(2): 140–144. - PubMed
    1. Cole JO. and the NIMH-psychopharmacology service center. (1964) NIMH-psychopharmacology service center collaborative study group. Phenothiazine treatment in acute schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 10: 246–261. - PubMed
    1. Creese I, Burt DR, Snyder SH. (1976) Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and pharmacological potencies or antischizophrenic drugs. Science 192(4238): 481–483. - PubMed
    1. Delay J, Deniker P. (1957) Characteristique neurophysiologique des medicaments neuroleptiques. Rapport symposium internationale medicaments neuroleptiques psychotropies. In: Garattini S, Ghetti V. (eds) Psychotropic Drugs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    1. Dencker SJ. (1976) High-dose treatment with neuroleptics in the acute phase of mental disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 69(Suppl. 1): 32–34. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources