Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 4:2:2398212818818070.
doi: 10.1177/2398212818818070. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

Transcranial brain stimulation: Past and future

Affiliations
Review

Transcranial brain stimulation: Past and future

John Rothwell. Brain Neurosci Adv. .

Abstract

This article provides a brief summary of the history of transcranial methods for stimulating the human brain in conscious volunteers and reviews the methodology and physiology of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. The former stimulates neural axons and generates action potentials and synaptic activity, whereas the latter polarises the membrane potential of neurones and changes their sensitivity to ongoing synaptic inputs. When coupled with brain imaging methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalography, transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to chart connectivity within the brain. In addition, because it induces artificial patterns of activity that interfere with ongoing information processing within a cortical area, it is frequently used in cognitive psychology to produce a short-lasting 'virtual lesion'. Both transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation can produce short-lasting changes in synaptic excitability and associated changes in behaviour that are presently the source of much research for their therapeutic potential.

Keywords: Transcranial magnetic stimulation; synaptic plasticity; transcranial direct current stimulation; virtual lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali MM, Sellers KK, Frohlich F. (2013) Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates large-scale cortical network activity by network resonance. Journal of Neuroscience 33(27): 11262–11275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barker AT, Garnham CW, Freeston IL. (1991) Magnetic nerve stimulation: The effect of waveform on efficiency, determination of neural membrane time constants and the measurement of stimulator output. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Supplement 43: 227–237. - PubMed
    1. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex [letter]. Lancet 1(8437): 1106–1107. - PubMed
    1. Bestmann S, Baudewig J, Siebner HR, et al. (2004) Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. European Journal of Neuroscience 19(7): 1950–1962. - PubMed
    1. Bindman LJ, Lippold OC, Redfearn JW. (1962) Long-lasting changes in the level of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex produced by polarizing currents. Nature 196(6): 584–585. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources