Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 9;1(8):e0034.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000034. eCollection 2019 Aug.

Implementation of an ICU Recovery Clinic at a Tertiary Care Academic Center

Affiliations

Implementation of an ICU Recovery Clinic at a Tertiary Care Academic Center

Rita N Bakhru et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

Post-ICU clinics may facilitate the care of survivors of critical illness, but there is a paucity of data describing post-ICU clinic implementation. We sought to describe implementation of our ICU recovery clinic, including an assessment of barriers and facilitators to clinic attendance.

Design: Adults admitted to the medical ICU of a large tertiary care academic hospital with shock and/or respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation were screened for participation in a newly formed ICU recovery clinic. Participant selection and attendance rates were tracked. Reasons for nonattendance were assessed by phone call in a subset of patients.

Setting: A newly formed ICU recovery clinic of a large tertiary care academic hospital.

Patients: All patients admitted to the medical ICU were screened.

Interventions: ICU recovery clinic appointments were scheduled for all eligible patients. A subset of nonattenders were called to assess reasons for nonattendance.

Measurements and main results: Over 2 years, we admitted 5,510 patients to our medical ICU. Three hundred sixty-two were screened into the recovery clinic. One-hundred sixty-six were not scheduled for clinic; major reasons included discharge to hospice/death in the hospital (n = 55) and discharge to a facility (n = 50). One-hundred ninety-six patients were scheduled for a visit and of those, 101 (52%) arrived to clinic. Reasons for nonattendance in a surveyed subset of nonattenders included patient's lack of awareness of the appointment (50%, n = 9/18), financial concerns (17%, n = 3/18), and transportation difficulty (17%, n = 3/18).

Conclusions: ICU recovery clinics may address the needs of survivors of critical illness. Barriers to clinic attendance include high mortality rates, high rates of clinic appointment cancelations and nonattendance, and discharge to locations such as skilled nursing facilities or long-term acute care hospitals. Improved communication to patients about the role of the clinic may facilitate attendance and minimize canceled appointments.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; attendance; clinic; critical illness; nonattendance; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of ICU recovery clinic. ARF = acute respiratory failure, LTACH = long-term acute care hospital, MICU = medical ICU, MV = mechanical ventilation, SNF = skilled nursing facility.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ICU recovery clinic attendance. A, Percent clinic attendance, nonattendance, and cancelations by screening month. Percentage of patients who attended clinic (green), canceled their clinic appointment (yellow), and did not attend their clinic appointment (red) is demonstrated by screening month. B, Numbers of patients with clinic attendance, nonattendance, cancelations, and no scheduled appointment by screening month. Numbers of patients who attended clinic (green), canceled their clinic appointment (yellow), did not attend their clinic appointment (red), and were not schedule for a clinic appointment (blue) is demonstrated by screening month.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carson SS, Cox CE, Holmes GM, et al. The changing epidemiology of mechanical ventilation: A population-based study. J Intensive Care Med 200621173–182 - PubMed
    1. Needham DM, Bronskill SE, Calinawan JR, et al. Projected incidence of mechanical ventilation in Ontario to 2026: Preparing for the aging baby boomers. Crit Care Med 200533574–579 - PubMed
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 20033481546–1554 - PubMed
    1. Stevenson EK, Rubenstein AR, Radin GT, et al. Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: A comparative meta-analysis*. Crit Care Med 201442625–631 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erickson SE, Martin GS, Davis JL, et al. ; NIH NHLBI ARDS Network Recent trends in acute lung injury mortality: 1996-2005. Crit Care Med 2009371574–1579 - PMC - PubMed