How disappointing: Startle modulation reveals conditional stimuli presented after pleasant unconditional stimuli acquire negative valence
- PMID: 32167177
- DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13563
How disappointing: Startle modulation reveals conditional stimuli presented after pleasant unconditional stimuli acquire negative valence
Abstract
Past research on backward conditioning in evaluative and fear conditioning yielded inconsistent results in that self-report measures suggest that the conditional stimulus (CS) acquired the valence of the unconditional stimulus (US) in fear conditioning (assimilation effects), but the opposite valence in evaluative conditioning (contrast effects). Conversely, implicit measures of CS valence suggest assimilation effects in evaluative backward conditioning, whereas startle modulation indicates contrast effects in backward fear conditioning. The current study investigated whether US intensity could account for the dissociation on implicit measures between fear and evaluative conditioning. Self-report measures of evaluative learning indicated assimilation effects for forward conditioning, whereas backward contrast effects were observed with intense USs only. Blink startle modulation indicated assimilation effects in forward conditioning and contrast effects in backward conditioning, regardless of US intensity. Experiment 2 included a neutral US in order to assess whether the offset of the positive US elicits an opponent emotional response that mirrors relief (disappointment), which is thought to mediate the reduction in startle seen during backward CSs in fear conditioning. This opponent emotional response was evident as startle magnitude during backward CSs increased linearly with increasing US pleasantness. Omission of the forward CSs led to an assimilation effect in self-report measures. The current results extend our understanding of emotional learning to stimuli encountered after salient emotional events. Startle reflects the emotion prevailing after US offset, relief or disappointment, whereas self-report measures seem more attuned to factors such as US predictability and intensity.
Keywords: associative learning; backward conditioning; evaluative conditioning; propositional learning; startle modulation.
© 2020 Society for Psychophysiological Research.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Andreatta, M., Mühlberger, A., Glotzbach-Schoon, E., & Pauli, P. (2013). Pain predictability reverses valence ratings of a relief-associated stimulus. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7(53), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00053
-
- Andreatta, M., Mühlberger, A., & Pauli, P. (2016). When does pleasure start after the end of pain? The time course of relief. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 524, 1653-1667. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23872
-
- Andreatta, M., Mühlberger, A., Yarali, A., Gerber, B., & Pauli, P. (2010). A rift between implicit and explicit conditioned valence in human pain relief learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2411-2416. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0103
-
- Andreatta, M., & Pauli, P. (2017). Learning mechanisms underlying threat absence and threat relief: Influences of trait anxiety. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 145, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2017.09.005
-
- Annau, Z., & Kamin, L. J. (1961). The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 428-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042199
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous