Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 13;22(3):e13680.
doi: 10.2196/13680.

The Application of Internet-Based Sources for Public Health Surveillance (Infoveillance): Systematic Review

Joana M Barros  1   2 , Jim Duggan  2 , Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann  3
Affiliations

The Application of Internet-Based Sources for Public Health Surveillance (Infoveillance): Systematic Review

Joana M Barros et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Public health surveillance is based on the continuous and systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. This informs the development of early warning systems to monitor epidemics and documents the impact of intervention measures. The introduction of digital data sources, and specifically sources available on the internet, has impacted the field of public health surveillance. New opportunities enabled by the underlying availability and scale of internet-based sources (IBSs) have paved the way for novel approaches for disease surveillance, exploration of health communities, and the study of epidemic dynamics. This field and approach is also known as infodemiology or infoveillance.

Objective: This review aimed to assess research findings regarding the application of IBSs for public health surveillance (infodemiology or infoveillance). To achieve this, we have presented a comprehensive systematic literature review with a focus on these sources and their limitations, the diseases targeted, and commonly applied methods.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted targeting publications between 2012 and 2018 that leveraged IBSs for public health surveillance, outbreak forecasting, disease characterization, diagnosis prediction, content analysis, and health-topic identification. The search results were filtered according to previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: Spanning a total of 162 publications, we determined infectious diseases to be the preferred case study (108/162, 66.7%). Of the eight categories of IBSs (search queries, social media, news, discussion forums, websites, web encyclopedia, and online obituaries), search queries and social media were applied in 95.1% (154/162) of the reviewed publications. We also identified limitations in representativeness and biased user age groups, as well as high susceptibility to media events by search queries, social media, and web encyclopedias.

Conclusions: IBSs are a valuable proxy to study illnesses affecting the general population; however, it is important to characterize which diseases are best suited for the available sources; the literature shows that the level of engagement among online platforms can be a potential indicator. There is a necessity to understand the population's online behavior; in addition, the exploration of health information dissemination and its content is significantly unexplored. With this information, we can understand how the population communicates about illnesses online and, in the process, benefit public health.

Keywords: chronic diseases; infectious diseases; infodemiology; infoveillance; medical informatics; public health; public health informatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart applied for the literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the selected literature per year and type.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of the case studies in the literature.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Data sources interaction cycle. WHO: World Health Organization.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Acheson D. Public Health in England: The Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Future Development to the Public Health Function. London: London Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1988.
    1. World Health Organization. 2018. [2018-08-27]. Public Health Services http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/public-health-se....
    1. World Health Organization. 2018. [2018-08-27]. Public Health Surveillance http://www.who.int/topics/public_health_surveillance/en/
    1. Nsubuga P, White ME, Thacker SB, Anderson MA, Blount SB, Broome CV, Chiller TM, Espitia V, Imtiaz R, Sosin D, Stroup DF, Tauxe RV, Vijayaraghavan M, Trostle M. Public health surveillance: a tool for targeting and monitoring interventions. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DV, Jha P, Mills A, Musgrove P, editors. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 997–1018.
    1. Hope K, Durrheim DN, d'Espaignet ET, Dalton C. Syndromic Surveillance: is it a useful tool for local outbreak detection? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 May;60(5):374–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.035337. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16680907 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources