Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;34(8):e282-e286.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001757.

Overlapping Surgery for Ankle Fractures: Is It Safe?

Aaron Baessler  1 , Brian Mullis, Randall Loder, Karsen Corn, Charles Mavros
Affiliations
Free article

Overlapping Surgery for Ankle Fractures: Is It Safe?

Aaron Baessler et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the practice of overlapping surgery influenced patient safety after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for ankle fractures.

Design: Retrospective case-control.

Setting: Level 1 Academic Midwest trauma center.

Patients: All patients who underwent ankle fracture ORIF by a single surgeon were eligible for our study, with 478 total patients.

Intervention: Cases that were overlapping were compared against cases that were not overlapping. Cases were defined as overlapping if there was greater than 30 minutes of overlap between procedural times. Patient complications were recorded up to a year from the index surgery.

Main outcome measure: Unexpected return to surgery.

Results: There were 478 ankle fracture ORIF patients, 238 with at least 3 months follow-up; 124 (52%) in the overlapping group and 114 (48%) in the nonoverlapping group. There was no difference in the rate of unexpected return to surgery (P = 0.76), infection (P = 0.52), readmission (P = 0.96), painful implant (P = 0.62), malunion (P = 0.27), nonunion (P = 0.52), or arthritis (P = 0.39) between the overlapping and nonoverlapping groups. There were 467 isolated ankle fractures used for time analysis. Average procedure time was 26 minutes longer for the overlapping group than the nonoverlapping group (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Overlapping surgery causes increased operative time for ankle ORIF, but there was no apparent increased risk to the patients for short-term complications. The need for graduated resident responsibility required by ACGME guidelines need to be weighed against the decreased efficiency of operating room time.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jenn A, Jonathan S, Liz K, et al. Clash in the Name of Care. 2015; Available at: https://apps.bostonglobe.com/spotlight/clash-in-the-name-of-care/story. Accessed June 15, 2019.
    1. Beasley GM, Pappas TN, Kirk AD. Procedure delegation by attending surgeons performing concurrent operations in academic medical centers: balancing safety and efficiency. Ann Surg. 2015;261:1044–1045.
    1. Surgeons, A.C.o. Statements on Principles. 2016. Available at: https://www.facs.org/about-acs/statements/stonprin. Accessed June 15, 2019.
    1. Levin PE, Moon D, Payne DE. Overlapping and concurrent surgery: a professional and ethical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:2045–2050.
    1. Edelstein AI, Lovecchio FC, Saha S, et al. Impact of resident involvement on orthopaedic surgery outcomes: an analysis of 30,628 patients from the American College of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e131.