Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e034942.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034942.

Prediction of gestational age with symphysis-fundal height and estimated uterine volume in a pregnancy cohort in Sylhet, Bangladesh

Affiliations

Prediction of gestational age with symphysis-fundal height and estimated uterine volume in a pregnancy cohort in Sylhet, Bangladesh

Anne C C Lee et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To improve the accuracy of the prediction of gestational age (GA) before birth with the standardised measurement of symphysis-fundal height (SFH), estimation of uterine volume, and statistical modelling including maternal anthropometrics and other factors.

Design: Prospective pregnancy cohort study.

Setting: Rural communities in Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Participants: 1516 women with singleton pregnancies with early pregnancy ultrasound dating (<20 weeks); 1486 completed follow-up.

Methods: SFH and abdominal girth were measured at subsequent antenatal care (ANC) visits by community health workers at 24 to 28, 32 to 36, and/or >37 weeks gestation. An estimated uterine volume (EUV) was calculated from these measures. Data on pregnancy characteristics and other maternal anthropometrics were also collected.

Primary outcome measure: GA at subsequent ANC visits, as defined by early ultrasound dating.

Results: 1486 (98%) women had at least one subsequent ANC visit, 1102 (74%) women had two subsequent ANC visits, and 748 (50%) had three visits. Using the common clinical practice of approximating the GA (in weeks) with the SFH measurement (cm), SFH systematically underestimated GA in late pregnancy (mean difference -4.4 weeks, 95% limits of agreement -12.5 to 3.7). For the classification of GA <28 weeks, SFH <26 cm had 85% sensitivity and 81% specificity; and for GA <34 weeks, SFH <29 cm had 83% sensitivity and 71% specificity. EUV had similar diagnostic accuracy. Despite rigorous statistical modelling of SFH, accounting for repeated longitudinal measurements and additional predictors, the best model without including a known last menstrual period predicted 95% of pregnancy dates within ±7.4 weeks of early ultrasound dating.

Conclusions: We were unable to predict GA with a high degree of accuracy before birth using maternal anthropometric measures and other available maternal characteristics. Efforts to improve GA dating in low- and middle-income countries before birth should focus on increasing coverage and training of ultrasonography.

Trial registration number: NCT01572532.

Keywords: estimated uterine volume; gestational age; preterm birth; symphysis fundal height; uterine fundal height.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JAL was the principal investigator of Every Preemie–SCALE Implementation Research programme.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Relationship between estimated uterine volume, symphysis-fundal height and abdominal girth. (B) Geometrical representation of a prolate ellipsoid (source: Image created by Peter Mercator, license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of relationship between gestational age, maternal anthropometrics and influencing factors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Symphysis-fundal height by gestational age (completed weeks) in Sylhet cohort (percentiles), with INTERGROWTH median measurements (50% percentile, dotted line), and clinical assumption (1cm=1week, dashed line). (B) Abdominal girth by gestational age in Sylhet cohort (percentiles). (C) Estimated uterine volume by gestational age in Sylhet cohort (percentiles). EUV, estimated uterine volume; GA, gestational age; SFH, symphysis-fundal height.

References

    1. Rijken MJ, Lee SJ, Boel ME, et al. . Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:395–403. 10.1002/uog.7350 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall MH, Carr-Hill RA, Fraser C, et al. . The extent and antecedents of uncertain gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:445–51. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01347.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savitz DA, Terry JW, Dole N, et al. . Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1660–6. 10.1067/mob.2002.127601 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, et al. . Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health 2013;10:S2 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aliyu LD, Kurjak A, Wataganara T, et al. . Ultrasound in Africa: what can really be done? J Perinat Med 2016;44:119–23. 10.1515/jpm-2015-0224 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources