Multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value of computerized tomography with delayed scanning after a double-dose of contrast medium in comparison with other diagnostic tests
- PMID: 3217020
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01795695
Multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value of computerized tomography with delayed scanning after a double-dose of contrast medium in comparison with other diagnostic tests
Abstract
In 63 cases of clinical definite or suspected MS we compared the results of CSF analysis, VEP, BAEP, CT scanning without and after double dose contrast, in 17 cases also those of MRT. We found that CSF analysis had the highest rate of abnormal findings, followed by MRT. VEP and CT with double dose contrast showed similar sensitivity, while BAEP and CT without contrast had disappointing results. We think that CT with delayed scanning after double dose contrast can be a very useful investigation in early and doubtful cases of MS, until MRT will become a more widespread and less expensive investigation.
Similar articles
-
CT of multiple sclerosis: reassessment of delayed scanning with high doses of contrast material.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Sep;145(3):497-500. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.3.497. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985. PMID: 3875253
-
Maximizing the harvest of contrast enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis.Neurology. 1982 Aug;32(8):815-20. doi: 10.1212/wnl.32.8.815. Neurology. 1982. PMID: 7201577
-
Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: results in 32 cases.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1985 Mar-Apr;6(2):171-6. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1985. PMID: 3920876 Free PMC article.
-
Evoked potentials. With special reference to the diagnostic value in multiple sclerosis.Acta Neurol Scand. 1983 Feb;67(2):67-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1983.tb04547.x. Acta Neurol Scand. 1983. PMID: 6342329 Review.
-
Did low tube voltage CT combined with low contrast media burden protocols accomplish the goal of "double low" for patients? An overview of applications in vessels and abdominal parenchymal organs over the past 5 years.Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70 Suppl 9B:B5-B15. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12861. Int J Clin Pract. 2016. PMID: 27577514 Review.