Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;39(6):1244-1256.
doi: 10.1002/etc.4712. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

Effects of Herbicides on Flowering

David J Carpenter  1 , Solvejg K Mathiassen  2 , Céline Boutin  1 , Beate Strandberg  3 , Carlene S Casey  1 , Christian Damgaard  3
Affiliations

Effects of Herbicides on Flowering

David J Carpenter et al. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 May.

Abstract

Herbicides have been shown to reduce flower production and to delay flowering, with results varying among herbicides and tested plant species. We investigated the effects of herbicides on flowering in an extensive greenhouse study conducted in Canada and Denmark. The effects of low doses of 5 different herbicides (bromoxynil, ioxynil + bromoxynil, metsulfuron-methyl, clopyralid, and glyphosate), simulating realistic drift scenarios (1 and 5% recommended field rates), on plant flowering were examined using 9 wild plant species exposed at either the seedling (6- to 8-leaf) or flower bud stage. Following herbicide exposure, initial flowering date as well as flower production over time were recorded over the growing period. The effect of herbicides on cumulative flower numbers and flowering time were modeled using Gompertz growth models. Significant delays to peak flowering and/or reductions in flower production were observed in at least one plant species for all tested herbicides, with glyphosate often exhibiting the greatest negative effects, that is, plant death. Except for ioxynil + bromoxynil, there was no clear evidence of either the seedling or the flower bud stage being more sensitive. Overall, 58% of all species × life stage × herbicide treatments resulted in either a statistically significant or a strong decline in flower production with herbicide application rates up to 5% of recommended field rates, whereas significant or strong delays in peak flowering were also detected but were slightly less common. Effects at 1% label rates were minimal. Simultaneous delays to peak flowering and reductions in total flower production occurred in approximately 25% of all cases, indicating that herbicide application rates simulating realistic drift scenarios would likely have negative effects on wild floral communities. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:1244-1256. © 2020 SETAC.

Keywords: Delays of flowering; Flower production; Gompertz growth models; Herbicide drift; Herbicides; Nontarget plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aguilar-Dorantes K, Mehltreter K, Mata-Rosas M, Vibrans H, Esqueda-Esquivel V. 2015. Glyphosate susceptibility of different life stages of three fern species. Am Fern J 105:131-144.
    1. Baude M, Kunin WE, Boatman ND, Conyers S, Davies N, Gillespie MAK, Morton RD, Smart SM, Memmott J. 2016. Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain. Nature 530:85-88.
    1. Bohnenblust EW, Vaudo AD, Egan JF, Mortensen DA, Tooker JF. 2016. Effects of the herbicide dicamba on nontarget plants and pollinator visitation. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:144-151.
    1. Bosch J, Retana J, Cerdá X. 1997. Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109:583-591.
    1. Boutin C, Strandberg B, Carpenter D, Mathiassen SK, Thomas PJ. 2014. Herbicide impact on non-target plant reproduction: What are the toxicological and ecological implications? Environ Pollut 185:295-306.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources