Comparison of neoadjuvant treatments followed by radical surgery or chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer
- PMID: 32173046
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.039
Comparison of neoadjuvant treatments followed by radical surgery or chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer
Abstract
Objective: To compare quality of life (Qol) of patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant treatments followed by radical surgery (NTS) or standard chemoradiation (CRT).
Methods: Patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer during 2006-2012 were treated with NTS or CRT and were invited to participate. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx) Questionnaire was used to assess patient Qol. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with Qol.
Results: In total, 90 (78.3%) out of 115 eligible patients completed the questionnaires. No significant differences were found in Qol between treatment groups, except that patients after NTS reported higher scores in the social/family well-being (e.g. satisfaction with sexual life, close relationships with partner or friends, and support from friends) than those after CRT, in particular, during 2-3 years after treatment. Results of multivariate analysis indicated that NTS was associated with better social/family functioning, while advanced stage of cervical cancer, lower family income and lower education were associated with impaired Qol in different domains.
Conclusions: Although self-reported Qol after treatment were not significantly different, NTS treated patients reported better social/family functioning than CRT treated patients, such as satisfaction with their sexual life and close relationships with partner or friends, during 2-3 years post treatment. These results were helpful for physicians to make treatment decisions while considering treatment-related Qol, and moreover, for rehabilitation and supportive care of patients after treatment. Further validation of our findings in randomized, controlled clinical trials is warranted.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Chemoradiation; Neoadjuvant treatments; Quality of life; Radical surgery.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Health-related quality of life in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery: A single-institutional retrospective study from a prospective database.Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Gynecol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31307665
-
Quality of life of locally advanced cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation versus chemoradiation alone (CIRCE trial): a randomized phase II trial.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jun;30(6):749-756. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001134. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32321767 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Patients With Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Squamous Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1548-1555. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9985. Epub 2018 Feb 12. J Clin Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29432076 Clinical Trial.
-
Primary radical hysterectomy vs chemoradiation for IB2-IIA cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(5):e18738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018738. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32000377 Free PMC article.
-
Survival and toxicity in neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Feb;83:101945. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101945. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020. PMID: 31838220
Cited by
-
The comparative study for survival outcome of locally advanced cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant arterial interventional chemotherapy or intravenous chemotherapy followed by surgery or concurrent chemoradiation.World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 7;20(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02859-w. World J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36476481 Free PMC article.
-
T-box 2 expression is a useful indicator of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Oncol Lett. 2021 Nov;22(5):755. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.13016. Epub 2021 Aug 31. Oncol Lett. 2021. PMID: 34539859 Free PMC article.
-
The Life Quality and Sexual Function of Women Underwent Radical Hysterectomy.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):581-589. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.2.581. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021. PMID: 33639677 Free PMC article.
-
Can laparoscopic nerve-sparing ultra-radical hysterectomy play a role in locally advanced cervical cancer? A single-center retrospective study.Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 25;12:1003951. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1003951. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36387086 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials