Combined refinements to somatic cell nuclear transfer methods improve porcine embryo development
- PMID: 32173679
- PMCID: PMC7297629
- DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2019-156
Combined refinements to somatic cell nuclear transfer methods improve porcine embryo development
Abstract
The discovery of how to utilize CRISPR (clustered, regularly interspaced, short, palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) systems for genome modification has accelerated development of the field of genome editing, especially in large animals such as pigs. The low efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is now becoming a major obstacle in the production of genome-edited animals via cell-mediated approaches and improving efficacy of this technique is crucial. In this study, we propose a few simple modifications to a zona-free SCNT protocol that are effective to produce numerous high-quality blastocysts. To refine the SCNT protocol we modified the following steps/factors: 1) culture medium for SCNT embryos, 2) chemical treatment to prevent precocious activation of the manipulated/reconstructed oocytes and 3) donor cell serum starvation treatment. Although changes in each of these steps only resulted in small improvements, the combination of all modifications altogether significantly enhanced developmental competence of SCNT embryos. Our modified method yielded approximately three times greater blastocyst formation rates. Moreover, resulting blastocysts had roughly twice as many cells as compared to blastocysts produced by the conventional SCNT method. With these significant in vitro improvements, our refined SCNT method is potentially suited for use in the production of genome edited pigs.
Keywords: Donor cells; Embryonic development competence; Pigs; Somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Increasing glucose in KSOMaa basal medium on culture Day 2 improves in vitro development of cloned caprine blastocysts produced via intraspecies and interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer.Theriogenology. 2012 Sep 1;78(4):921-9. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 Jun 14. Theriogenology. 2012. PMID: 22704387
-
Difference in sensitivity to culture condition between in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs.J Reprod Dev. 2009 Jun;55(3):299-304. doi: 10.1262/jrd.20174. Epub 2009 Mar 16. J Reprod Dev. 2009. PMID: 19293559
-
Effects of MG132 on the in vitro development and epigenetic modification of Debao porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.Theriogenology. 2017 May;94:48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Theriogenology. 2017. PMID: 28407860
-
Effects of trichostatin A on pig SCNT blastocyst formation rate and cell number: A meta-analysis.Res Vet Sci. 2018 Apr;117:161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 18. Res Vet Sci. 2018. PMID: 29277014 Review.
-
Navigating gene editing in porcine embryos: Methods, challenges, and future perspectives.Genomics. 2025 Mar;117(2):111014. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2025.111014. Epub 2025 Feb 13. Genomics. 2025. PMID: 39952413 Review.
Cited by
-
- Invited Review - Reproductive technologies needed for the generation of precise gene-edited pigs in the pathways from laboratory to farm.Anim Biosci. 2023 Feb;36(2):339-349. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0389. Epub 2022 Nov 14. Anim Biosci. 2023. PMID: 36397683 Free PMC article.
-
Crosstalk between Peroxisomal Activities and Nrf2 Signaling in Porcine Embryos.Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 May 13;10(5):771. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050771. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34068072 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pennisi E. The CRISPR craze. Science 2013; 341: 833–836. - PubMed
-
- Barrangou R, May AP. Unraveling the potential of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2015; 15: 311–314. - PubMed
-
- Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 2014; 346: 1258096. - PubMed