Comparative clinical trial of intracameral ropivacaine vs. lignocaine in subjects undergoing phacoemulsification under augmented topical anesthesia
- PMID: 32174572
- PMCID: PMC7210834
- DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1388_19
Comparative clinical trial of intracameral ropivacaine vs. lignocaine in subjects undergoing phacoemulsification under augmented topical anesthesia
Abstract
Purpose: To compare intracameral Ropivacaine to Lignocaine during phacoemulsification under augmented topical anesthesia, in terms of efficacy and safety.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial included subjects planned for phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation for visually significant uncomplicated senile cataract, under augmented topical anesthesia. Cases were randomized into two groups, Group A (Ropivacaine 0.1%) or Group B (Lignocaine 1.0%). The pain experienced by the patients during the surgery, mydriasis, post-op inflammation and endothelial cell change at six weeks after the procedure was evaluated. Surgeon's feedback was recorded to evaluate the cooperation of the patient during surgery.
Results: A total of 210 subjects were screened and 184 were randomized to have 92 subjects in each group. There was no statistically significant difference seen on comparing Group A and B with respect to Age (P = 0.05), painful surgical steps (P = 0.85), visual analog scale scores (P = 0.65), surgeon's score (P = 0.11), postoperative inflammation (P = 0.90) and average ultrasound time during phacoemulsification (P = 0.10). Subjects in Group A fared better when compared to Group B with respect to endothelial cell loss (P = 0.0008), and augmentation in mydriasis (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Intracameral Ropivacaine and Lignocaine, both are equally effective in providing analgesia during phacoemulsification. However, intracameral Ropivacaine is superior to Lignocaine with regards to corneal endothelial cell safety, and augmenting mydriasis.
Keywords: Cataract surgery; intracameral anesthesia; lignocaine; phacoemulsification; ropivacaine; topical anesthesia; visual analog pain scale.
Conflict of interest statement
None
Figures
Comment in
-
Utilization of the CONSORT checklist to enhance clinical trials reporting - A critical analysis.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;69(3):780. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2521_20. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33595530 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ellwein LB, Lepkowski JM, Thulasiraj RD, Brilliant GE. The cost-effectiveness of strategies to reduce barriers to cataract surgery. The Operations Research Group. Int Ophthalmol. 1991;15:175–83. - PubMed
-
- Jaggernath J, Gogate P, Moodley V, Naidoo KS. Comparison of cataract surgery techniques: Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24:520–6. - PubMed
-
- Zhao LQ, Zhu H, Zhao PQ, Wu QR, Hu YQ. Topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia for cataract surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:659–67. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
