Implementing civic engagement within mental health services in South East Asia: a systematic review and realist synthesis of current evidence
- PMID: 32175004
- PMCID: PMC7063827
- DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00352-z
Implementing civic engagement within mental health services in South East Asia: a systematic review and realist synthesis of current evidence
Abstract
Introduction: Civic engagement (CE) has the potential to transform mental health services and could be particularly important for low and middle-income countries (LMICs), which are rapidly developing to respond to the burden of poor mental health. Research from high income countries has found many challenges associated with the meaningful implementation of CE in practice, but this has been underexplored in LIMCS and in South East Asia (SEA) in particular.
Methods: We completed a realist synthesis and systematic review of peer reviewed publications and grey literature to identify the context and actions which promote successful implementation of CE approaches in SEA. We used a theory-driven approach-realist synthesis-to analyse data and develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations that can be used to explain how civic engagement approaches operate in South East Asian contexts. We worked closely with patient and public representatives to guide the review from the outset.
Results: Fifty-seven published and unpublished articles were included, 24 were evaluations of CE, including two Randomized Controlled Trials. The majority of CE interventions featured uptake or adaptation of Western models of care. We identified important cultural differences in the enactment of civic engagement in SEA contexts and four mechanisms which, alongside their contextual barriers and facilitators, can be used to explain how civic engagement produces a range of outcomes for people experiencing mental health problems, their families and communities. Our review illustrates how CE interventions can be successfully implemented in SEA, however Western models should be adapted to fit with local cultures and values to promote successful implementation. Barriers to implementation included distrust of services/outside agencies, stigma, paternalistic cultures, limited resource and infrastructure.
Conclusion: Our findings provide guidance for the implementation of CE approaches within SEA contexts and identify areas for further research. Due to the collectivist nature of many SEA cultures, and the impact of shared traumas on community mental health, CE might best be implemented at community level, with a focus on relational decision making.Registration This review is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42018087841.
Keywords: Civic engagement; Global health; Mental health; Patient and public involvement; Realist synthesis; South East Asia.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare there are no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization . Community participation in local health and sustainable development: approaches and techniques. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
-
- World Health Organization . WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: interim report. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
-
- Gottlieb BH, Gillespie AA. Volunteerism, health, and civic engagement among older adults. Can J Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 2008;27:399–406. - PubMed
-
- Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2005;14:1–3. - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
