Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 26;5(2):96-103.
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190025. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

Affiliations
Review

Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

Martin Clementson et al. EFORT Open Rev. .

Abstract

In cases of suspected scaphoid fracture where the initial radiographs are negative, a supplementary MRI, or alternatively CT, should be carried out within three to five days.Fracture classification, assessment of dislocation as well as evaluation of fracture healing is best done on CT with reconstructions in the coronal and sagittal planes, following the longitudinal axis of the scaphoid.After adequate conservative management, union is achieved at six weeks for approximately 90% of non-displaced or minimally displaced (≤ 0.5 mm) scaphoid waist fractures.Scaphoid waist fractures with moderate displacement (0.5-1.5 mm) can be treated conservatively, but require prolonged cast immobilization for approximately eight to ten weeks.Internal fixation is recommended for all scaphoid waist fractures with dislocation ≥ 1.5 mm.Distal scaphoid fractures can be treated conservatively. The majority heal uneventfully after four to six weeks of immobilization, depending on fracture type.In general, proximal scaphoid fractures should be treated with internal fixation. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:96-103. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190025.

Keywords: internal fixation; non-operative treatment; scaphoid fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scaphoid fractures: diagnostic algorithm.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scaphoid waist fractures: treatment algorithm. Note. DISI, dorsal inter-calated segment instability.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scaphoid proximal pole fractures: treatment algorithm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distal scaphoid fractures: treatment algorithm.

References

    1. Hove LM. Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Bergen, Norway. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999;33:423–426. - PubMed
    1. Jørgsholm P, Thomsen NO, Besjakov J, Abrahamsson SO, Björkman A. The benefit of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with posttraumatic radial wrist tenderness. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:29–33. - PubMed
    1. Ram AN, Chung KC. Evidence-based management of acute nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2009;34:735–738. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amirfeyz R, Bebbington A, Downing ND, Oni JA, Davis TR. Displaced scaphoid waist fractures: the use of a week 4 CT scan to predict the likelihood of union with nonoperative treatment. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011;36:498–502. - PubMed
    1. Clementson M, Jørgsholm P, Besjakov J, Björkman A, Thomsen N. Union of scaphoid waist fractures assessed by CT scan. J Wrist Surg 2015;4:49–55. - PMC - PubMed