Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;11(1):91-101.
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.10.03.

Is my life going to change?-a review of quality of life after rectal resection

Affiliations
Review

Is my life going to change?-a review of quality of life after rectal resection

Daniel Fernández-Martínez et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Rectal resection is a common practice for colorectal surgeons. The causes of this procedure are varied. The most frequent is cancer, but also inflammatory bowel disease, endometriosis, and rectovaginal or rectourethral fistulas. The loss of the normal rectal reservoir function, urinary problems, sexual dysfunction or pelvic pain are frequently reported in patients after rectal surgery and these disorders markedly affect the overall quality of life (QoL). In the last decades, rectal surgery has radically changed, with the development of surgical techniques, and it has progressed from abdominoperineal resection (APR) with a permanent colostomy to sphincter-saving procedures. Nowadays, the use of sphincter-preserving surgery has increased, but all these surgical techniques can have important sequels that modify the QoL of the patients. Historically, surgical outcomes, such as complications, survival and recurrences, have been widely studied by surgeons. In the present day, surgical outcomes have improved, rectal cancer recurrence rate has decreased and survival has increased. For these reasons, it has begun to gain importance in aspects of the QoL of patients, such as body image, fecal continence and sexuality or urinary function. Therefore, physicians should know the influence of different techniques and approaches on functional outcomes and QoL, to be able to inform patients of the treatment benefits and risk of postoperative dysfunctions. The aim of our study is to review the current literature to determine to what degree the QoL of patients who underwent a rectal resection decreases, which domains are the most affected and, in addition, to establish the influence of different surgical techniques and approaches on functional outcomes.

Keywords: Quality of life (QoL); bowel dysfunction; health status; rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49. 10.3322/caac.20006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. version 1.0. IARC CancerBase No. 5. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001.
    1. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986,1:1479-82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abraham NS, Davila JA, Rabeneck L, et al. Increased use of low anterior resection for veterans with rectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:35-41. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02286.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:252-71. 10.3322/caac.21235 - DOI - PubMed