The Immunological Basis of Dry Eye Disease and Current Topical Treatment Options
- PMID: 32175799
- PMCID: PMC7175622
- DOI: 10.1089/jop.2019.0060
The Immunological Basis of Dry Eye Disease and Current Topical Treatment Options
Abstract
Homeostasis of the lacrimal functional unit is needed to ensure a well-regulated ocular immune response comprising innate and adaptive phases. When the ocular immune system is excessively stimulated and/or immunoregulatory mechanisms are disrupted, the balance between innate and adaptive phases is dysregulated and chronic ocular surface inflammation can result, leading to chronic dry eye disease (DED). According to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II definition, DED is a multifactorial disorder of the ocular surface characterized by impairment and loss of tear homeostasis (hyperosmolarity), ocular discomfort or pain, and neurosensory abnormalities. Dysregulated ocular immune responses result in ocular surface damage, which is a further contributing factor to DED pathology. Several therapeutics are available to break the vicious circle of DED and prevent chronic disease and progression, including immunosuppressive agents (steroids) and immunomodulators (cyclosporine and lifitegrast). Given the chronic inflammatory nature of DED, each of these agents is commonly used in clinical practice. In this study, we review the immunopathology of DED and the molecular and cellular actions of current topical DED therapeutics to inform clinical decision making.
Keywords: T cells; dry eye disease; goblet cells; immune dysregulation; immunology; inflammation; integrin protein; intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1); lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1); ocular surface.
Conflict of interest statement
L.M.P. has been a consultant and speaker's bureau member for Allergan, Lumenis, Shire, Sun, and TearLab. V.L.P. has been a consultant and speaker's bureau member for Alcon, EyeGate, Mallinckrodt, Trefoil, and Shire. D.R.S. has received an investigator-initiated research grant from Shire. M.C.L. has been a consultant for Health Advances, Novartis, and Shire and has received research funding from CooperVision, Inc., Essilor USA, Johnson & Johnson, Leo Lens, Inc., Orinda Pharma, Verily Life Science, and Viewpoint Pharmaceuticals. P.N. declares no conflicts of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Craig J.P., Nichols K.K., Akpek E.K., Caffery B., Dua H.S., Joo C.-K., Liu Z., Nelson J.D., Nichols J.J., Tsubota K., and Stapleton F.. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul. Surf. 15:276–283, 2017 - PubMed
-
- Lemp M.A., Crews L.A., Bron A.J., Foulks G.N., and Sullivan B.D.. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 31:472–478, 2012 - PubMed
-
- Stern M.E., Gao J., Siemasko K.F., Beuerman R.W., and Pflugfelder S.C.. The role of the lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp. Eye Res. 78:409–416, 2004 - PubMed
-
- Pflugfelder S.C. Prevalence, burden, and pharmacoeconomics of dry eye disease. Am. J. Manag. Care. 14 Suppl 3:S102–S106, 2008 - PubMed
-
- Stapleton F., Alves M., Bunya V.Y., Jalbert I., Lekhanont K., Malet F., Na K.-S., Schaumberg D., Uchino M., Vehof J., Viso E., Vitale S., and Jones L.. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul. Surf. 15:334–365, 2017 - PubMed