Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):531-540.
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000659.

Validation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Adrien M Winning  1 , Jenna Merandi  2 , Joseph R Rausch, Nancy Liao, James M Hoffman  3 , Jonathan D Burlison  3 , Cynthia A Gerhardt
Affiliations

Validation of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Adrien M Winning et al. J Patient Saf. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to validate a revised version of the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST-R). The SVEST survey instrument was developed to measure the emotional and professional impact of medical errors and adverse patient events on healthcare providers and can help healthcare organizations evaluate the effectiveness of support resources.

Methods: An SVEST-R was completed by 316 healthcare providers from seven neonatal intensive care units affiliated with a large, pediatric hospital. The original 29-item measure was expanded to 43 items to assess eight psychosocial domains (psychological distress, physical distress, colleague support, supervisor support, institutional support, nonwork-related support, professional self-efficacy, resilience) and two employment-related domains (turnover intentions, absenteeism) associated with the second victim experience. Seven additional items assessed desired forms of support (e.g., time away from the unit). A confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the factor structure of the modified measure.

Results: The initial confirmatory factor analysis did not reveal an acceptable factor structure; thus, eight items were removed because of inadequate factor loadings or for conceptual reasons. This resulted in an acceptable model for the final 35-item measure. The final version included nine factors (i.e., psychological distress, physical distress, colleague support, supervisor support, institutional support, professional self-efficacy, resilience, turnover intentions, and absenteeism), with Cronbach α ranging from 0.66 to 0.86.

Conclusions: The SVEST-R is a valid measure for assessing the impact of errors or adverse events on healthcare providers. Importantly, the SVEST-R now includes positive outcomes (i.e., resilience) that may result from the second victim experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Aasland OG, Førde R. Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. BMJ Qual Saf . 2005;14:13–17.
    1. Lander LI, Connor JA, Shah RK, et al. Otolaryngologists’ responses to errors and adverse events. Laryngoscope . 2006;116:1114–1120.
    1. Seys D, Wu AW, Van Gerven E, et al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof . 2013;36:135–162.
    1. West C, Huschka M, Novotny P, et al. Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA . 2006;296:1071–1078.
    1. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ . 2000;320:726–727.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources