Significant Dose-Response between Exercise Adherence and Hemoglobin A1c Change
- PMID: 32175973
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002339
Significant Dose-Response between Exercise Adherence and Hemoglobin A1c Change
Abstract
Introduction: The Diabetes Aerobic and Resistance Exercise trial found that aerobic training and resistance training alone each reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared with nonexercising controls, and combined aerobic and resistance training caused greater HbA1c reduction than either training type alone. Our objective was to determine whether a dose-response relationship existed between frequency of exercise training and HbA1c change, and whether this varied by exercise modality or participant characteristics.
Methods: Post hoc analysis of data from 185 Diabetes Aerobic and Resistance Exercise trial participants with type 2 diabetes randomized to aerobic, resistance or combined training thrice weekly. Dose-response relationships between adherence (percent of prescribed training sessions completed) and HbA1c change were assessed with linear regression.
Results: Median overall adherence was 84.9% (interquartile range, 74.4%-93.6%). Higher exercise adherence was associated with greater HbA1c reduction; a 20% increase in adherence (e.g., an additional two sessions per month) was associated with a 0.15% (2 mmol·mol) decrease in HbA1c (β = -0.0076, R = -0.170, P = 0.021). Significant dose-response relationships were identified for aerobic (β = -0.0142, R = -0.313, P = 0.016) and combined training (β = -0.0109, R = -0.259, P = 0.041), but not resistance training (β = 0.0068, R = 0.153, P = 0.233). Dose-response relationships in all training groups combined were significant in subgroups younger than 55 yr (β = -0.0113, R = -0.286, P = 0.005), males (β = -0.0123, R = -0.234, P = 0.010), and baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% (58 mmol·mol) (β = -0.013, R = -0.263, P = 0.011).
Conclusions: There was a dose-response relationship between adherence to prescribed exercise and HbA1c reduction suggesting that glycemic control is improved more in individuals with type 2 diabetes with a higher training volume. Dose-response relationships existed for aerobic and combined training but not resistance training. These findings support aerobic and combined exercise prescriptions outlined in clinical practice guidelines.
References
-
- Balducci S, Zanuso S, Massarini M, et al. The Italian diabetes and exercise study (IDES): Design and methods for a prospective Italian multicentre trial of intensive lifestyle intervention in people with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;18(9):585–95.
-
- Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Boulé NG, et al. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(6):357–69.
-
- Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(20):2253–62.
-
- Umpierre D, Ribeiro PAB, Kramer CK, et al. Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(17):1790–9.
-
- Chen L, Pei J-H, Kuang J, et al. Effect of lifestyle intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2015;64(2):338–47.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
