Early and prehospital trauma deaths: Who might benefit from advanced resuscitative care?
- PMID: 32176169
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002657
Early and prehospital trauma deaths: Who might benefit from advanced resuscitative care?
Abstract
Background: Recent civilian and military data from the United States and the United Kingdom suggest that further reductions in mortality will require prehospital or preoperating room hemorrhage control and blood product resuscitation. The aims of this study were to examine the potential preventability of prehospital and early in-hospital fatalities, and to consider the geographical location of such incidents, to contextualize how the use of advanced resuscitative techniques could be operationalized.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of prehospital and early in-hospital trauma deaths from January to December 2017. Data were obtained from the Coroner/ME's Office. Each death was reviewed by a panel of two trauma surgeons and a forensic pathologist. Anatomical and physiological survivabilities were evaluated separately, and then combined, leading to a holistic assessment of preventability. Incident locations were mapped and analyzed using ArcGIS.
Results: Three hundred sixteen trauma deaths were identified. Two hundred thirty-one (73%) were deemed anatomically not survivable; 29 (9%) anatomically survivable, but only with hospital care; 43 (14%) anatomically survivable with advanced prehospital care; and 13 (4%) anatomically survivable with basic prehospital care. Physiologically, 114 (36%) of the patients had been dead for some time when found; 137 (43%) had no cardiorespiratory effort on arrival of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) at the scene; 24 (8%) had cardiorespiratory effort at the scene, but not on arrival at the emergency department; and 41 (13%) had cardiorespiratory effort on arrival at the emergency department, but died shortly after. Combining the assessments, 10 (3%) deaths were deemed probably not preventable, 38 (12%) possibly preventable, and the remaining 278 (85%) not preventable.
Conclusion: Twelve percent of trauma deaths were potentially preventable and might be amenable to advanced resuscitative interventions. Operationalizing this type of care will be challenging and will require either prehospital doctors, or very highly trained paramedics, nurses, or physician assistants.
Level of evidence: Epidemiological, level III.
Comment in
-
In response to: Early and prehospital trauma deaths: Emergency physicians should not be alone to win the game.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):e117. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002814. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. PMID: 32467460 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):e117. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002813. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. PMID: 33009201 No abstract available.
-
Multidisciplinary prehospital critical care.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):e188-e189. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002858. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. PMID: 33231953 No abstract available.
References
-
- Holcomb JB. Transport time and preoperating room hemostatic interventions are important: improving outcomes after severe truncal injury. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(3):447–453.
-
- Lerner EB, Moscati RM. The golden hour: scientific fact or medical “urban legend”? Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(7):758–760.
-
- Alarhayem AQ, Myers JG, Dent D, et al. Time is the enemy: mortality in trauma patients with hemorrhage from torso injury occurs long before the “golden hour”. Am J Surg. 2016;212(6):1101–1105.
-
- Kotwal RS, Howard JT, Orman JA, Tarpey BW, Bailey JA, Champion HR, Mabry RL, Holcomb JB, Gross KR. The effect of a golden hour policy on the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):15–24.
-
- Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S431–S437.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous