Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;29(6):847-853.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7872. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

Provider Counseling and Women's Family Planning Decisions in the Postpartum Period

Affiliations

Provider Counseling and Women's Family Planning Decisions in the Postpartum Period

Alison N Goulding et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Provider counseling may influence women's postpartum family planning decisions. Materials and Methods: We conducted an anonymous Internet-based cross-sectional survey of postpartum women regarding multiple topics, including prenatal/postpartum care and family planning. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between quantity of provider counseling (indexed as number of family planning topics discussed with a health care provider) and women's decisions regarding contraception and pregnancy spacing. Results: From January to May 2016, 2,850 women completed the survey and met inclusion criteria. Among this group, the majority were white (93%), ≥30 years (63%), and had obtained a college degree or higher (74%). Approximately half (49%) desired an interpregnancy interval (IPI) >2 years, and the minority (21%) used a highly effective contraceptive method (defined as long-acting reversible contraception or sterilization). The majority of women (56%) had received counseling on three to six family planning topics (defined as "more counseling" in regression models). Women who received more counseling were more likely to use a highly effective contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.33, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.09-1.62) but were not more likely to desire an IPI >2 years (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.14). Desired IPI modified the association between provider counseling and contraception (p = 0.06 for interaction): Among those desiring an IPI >2 years, more counseling was associated with use of a highly effective contraceptive method (AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.23-2.03), but this was not observed among those desiring a shorter IPI (AOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73-1.49). Conclusions: Contraceptive decisions depend on both provider counseling and patient goals.

Keywords: contraception; family planning education; postpartum; pregnancy interval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Association between quantity of provider counselinga and use of a highly effective contraceptive method,b stratified by desired IPI.c aMore counseling is defined as counseling on 3–6 family planning topics, whereas less counseling is defined as counseling on 0–2 family planning topics. Counseling could occur at any point in the prenatal or postpartum periods. bHighly effective methods include the IUD, contraceptive implant, tubal ligation, or vasectomy. cThis model examined effect modification of desired IPI on the association between quantity of provider counseling and use of a highly effective contraceptive method by adding an interaction term (desired IPI × quantity of provider counseling) to the full model. The model also adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, marital status, education, income, parity, timing of return to work, and region. p = 0.06 for interaction term. n = 2,584. IPI, interpregnancy interval; IUD, intrauterine device.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Castaño F, Norton MH. Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: A systematic review of causal mechanisms. Stud Fam Plann 2012;43:93–114 - PubMed
    1. Kozuki N, Lee AC, Silveira MF, et al. . The associations of birth intervals with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2013;13:S3 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zerbo O, Yoshida C, Gunderson EP, Dorward K, Croen LA. Interpregnancy interval and risk of autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 2015;136:651–657 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Copen CE, Thoma ME, Kirmeyer S. Interpregnancy intervals in the United States: Data from the birth certificate and the national survey of family growth. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015;64:1–11 - PubMed
    1. Gemmill A, Lindberg LD. Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:64–71 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances