How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election
- PMID: 32176697
- PMCID: PMC7075674
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229096
How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election
Erratum in
-
Correction: How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233868. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32437442 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Redistribution preferences depend on factors such as self-interest and political views. Recently, Deffains et al. (2016) reported that redistributive behavior is also sensitive to the actual experience of success or failure in a real effort task. While successful participants ('overachievers') are more likely to attribute their success to their effort rather than luck and opt for less redistribution, unsuccessful participants ('underachievers') tend to attribute their failure to external factors and opt for more redistribution. The aim of the present study was to test how the experience of success (symbolic success) and political views interact in producing redistributive behavior in an experimental setting. The study was conducted during the 2017 French presidential election. Our sample was biased towards left-wing, and most participants reported voting for Mélenchon, Hamon or Macron. Our findings reveal that 1) Macron voters redistribute less than Hamon voters who themselves redistribute less than Mélenchon voters, 2) overachievers redistribute less than underachievers only among Mélenchon voters. This suggests that redistributive behavior is governed primarily by political opinions, and that influence by exogenous manipulation of symbolic success is not homogenous across left-wing political groups.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Alesina A., & Angeletos G.-M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. The American Economic Review, 95, 960–980.
-
- Corneo G., & Grüner H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 83–107.
-
- Capraro V., & Rand D. G. (2018). Do the right thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 99–111.
-
- Fong C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 225–246.
-
- Boarini R., & Le Clainche C. (2009). Social preferences for public intervention: An empirical investigation based on French data. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 115–128.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources