Why the -omic future of Apicomplexa should include gregarines
- PMID: 32176937
- DOI: 10.1111/boc.202000006
Why the -omic future of Apicomplexa should include gregarines
Abstract
Gregarines, a polyphyletic group of apicomplexan parasites infecting mostly non-vertebrates hosts, remains poorly known at taxonomic, phylogenetic and genomic levels. However, it represents an essential group for understanding evolutionary history and adaptive capacities of apicomplexan parasites to the remarkable diversity of their hosts. Because they have a mostly extracellular lifestyle, gregarines have developed other cellular developmental forms and host-parasite interactions, compared with their much better studied apicomplexan cousins, intracellular parasites of vertebrates (Hemosporidia, Coccidia, Cryptosporidia). This review highlights the promises offered by the molecular exploration of gregarines, that have been until now left on the side of the road of the comparative -omic exploration of apicomplexan parasites. Elucidating molecular bases for both their ultrastructural, functional and behavioural similarities and differences, compared with those of the typical apicomplexan models, is expected to provide entirely novel clues on the adaptive capacities developed by Apicomplexa over evolution. A challenge remains to identify which gregarines should be explored in priority, as recent metadata from open and host-associated environments have confirmed how underestimated is our current view on true gregarine biodiversity. It is now time to turn to gregarines to widen the currently highly skewed view we have of adaptive mechanisms developed by Apicomplexa.
Keywords: Apicomplexa; Evolutionary history; Genomics; Parasitology; Protozoa.
© 2020 Société Française des Microscopies and Société de Biologie Cellulaire de France. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Adl, S.M., Bass, D., Lane, C.E., Lukes, J., Schoch, C.L., Smirnov, A., Agatha, S., Berney, C., Brown, M.W., Burki, F., Cardenas, P., Cepicka, I., Chistyakova, L., Del Campo, J., Dunthorn, M., Edvardsen, B., Eglit, Y., Guillou, L., Hampl, V., Heiss, A.A., Hoppenrath, M., James, T.Y., Karpov, S., Kim, E., Kolisko, M., Kudryavtsev, A., Lahr, D.J.G., Lara, E., Le Gall, L., Lynn, D.H., Mann, D.G., Massana, I.M.R., Mitchell, E.A.D., Morrow, C., Park, J.S., Pawlowski, J.W., Powell, M.J., Richter, D.J., Rueckert, S., Shadwick, L., Shimano, S., Spiegel, F.W., Torruella, I.C.G., Youssef, N., Zlatogursky, V. and Zhang, Q. (2018) Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 66, 4-119
-
- Aly, A.S., Vaughan, A.M. and Kappe, S.H. (2009) Malaria parasite development in the mosquito and infection of the mammalian host. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 195-221
-
- Aurrecoechea, C., Barreto, A., Basenko, E.Y., Brestelli, J., Brunk, B.P., Cade, S., Crouch, K., Doherty, R., Falke, D., Fischer, S., Gajria, B., Harb, O.S., Heiges, M., Hertz-Fowler, C., Hu, S., Iodice, J., Kissinger, J.C., Lawrence, C., Li, W., Pinney, D.F., Pulman, J.A., Roos, D.S., Shanmugasundram, A., Silva-Franco, F., Steinbiss, S., Stoeckert C.J., Jr., Spruill, D., Wang, H., Warrenfeltz, S. and Zheng, J. (2017) EuPathDB: the eukaryotic pathogen genomics database resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D581-D591
-
- Bahrndorff, S., Alemu, T., Alemneh, T. and Lund Nielsen, J. (2016) The microbiome of animals: implications for conservation biology. Int. J. Genomics 2016, 5304028
-
- Barta, J.R. and Thompson, R.C. (2006) What is Cryptosporidium? Reappraising its biology and phylogenetic affinities. Trends Parasitol. 22, 463-468
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
