Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 28:14:39.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039. eCollection 2020.

Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction

Affiliations
Review

Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction

Artur Czeszumski et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Social interactions are a crucial part of human life. Understanding the neural underpinnings of social interactions is a challenging task that the hyperscanning method has been trying to tackle over the last two decades. Here, we review the existing literature and evaluate the current state of the hyperscanning method. We review the type of methods (fMRI, M/EEG, and fNIRS) that are used to measure brain activity from more than one participant simultaneously and weigh their pros and cons for hyperscanning. Further, we discuss different types of analyses that are used to estimate brain networks and synchronization. Lastly, we present results of hyperscanning studies in the context of different cognitive functions and their relations to social interactions. All in all, we aim to comprehensively present methods, analyses, and results from the last 20 years of hyperscanning research.

Keywords: EEG; MEG; fMRI; fNIRS; hyperscanning; joint action; social cognition; social interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neuroimaging methods used in Hyperscanning. (A) From Koike et al. (2019). View of the dual fMRI facility used to study mutual gaze. (B) From Acquadro et al. (2016). EEG measurement of two guitar players. (C) From Osaka et al. (2015). fNIRS set up used to study cooperative singing. All parts reproduced/adapted under CC licenses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis methods used in hyperscanning to investigate between brain relationships. (A) From Yun et al. (2012). Phase synchrony was used as a coupling measure to investigate between-brain connections in implicit coordination task. Topography of the phase synchrony (PLV) between different regions of interest of two participants are presented for theta (4–7.5 Hz) and beta (12–30 Hz) oscillations. (B) From Koike et al. (2016). Between-brain synchronization estimated with correlation. (C) From Müller et al. (2013). Brain topography maps illustrating significant connection within and between the brains. Example of graph theory measures applied to analyze synchronization during musical improvisation on the guitar. All parts reproduced/adapted under CC licenses.

References

    1. İşbilir E., Cummins F., Ayaz H. (2016). “Investigating brain-brain interactions of a dyad using fNIR hyperscanning during joint sentence reading task,” in 3rd International Symposium on Brain Cognitive Science (Istanbul: ).
    1. Abe M. O., Koike T., Okazaki S., Sugawara S. K., Takahashi K., Watanabe K., et al. (2019). Neural correlates of online cooperation during joint force production. Neuroimage 191, 150–161. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acquadro M. A. S., Congedo M., De Riddeer D. (2016). Music Performance as an experimental approach to hyperscanning studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:242. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00242 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn S., Cho H., Kwon M., Kim K., Kwon H., Kim B. S., et al. (2018). Interbrain phase synchronization during turn-taking verbal interaction-a hyperscanning study using simultaneous EEG/MEG: synchronization during turn-taking verbal interaction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 171–188. 10.1002/hbm.23834 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anders S., Heinzle J., Weiskopf N., Ethofer T., Haynes J.-D. (2011). Flow of affective information between communicating brains. Neuroimage 54, 439–446. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed