Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 5:18:101072.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101072. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Evaluation of family health history collection methods impact on data and risk assessment outcomes

R Ryanne Wu  1   2 , Rehena Sultana  3 , Yasmin Bylstra  4 , Saumya Jamuar  4   5   6 , Sonia Davila  4   7 , Weng Khong Lim  4   8 , Geoffrey S Ginsburg  1 , Lori A Orlando  1 , Khung Keong Yeo  7   9 , Stuart A Cook  4   7   9 , Patrick Tan  4   7   8   10
Affiliations

Evaluation of family health history collection methods impact on data and risk assessment outcomes

R Ryanne Wu et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Information technology applications for patient-collection of family health history (FHH) increase identification of elevated-risk individuals compared to usual care. It is unknown if the method of collection impacts data collected or if simply going directly to the patient is what makes the difference. The objective of this study was to examine differences in data detail and risk identification rates between FHH collection directly from individuals using paper-based forms and an interactive web-based platform. This is a non-randomized epidemiologic study in Singaporean population from 2016 to 2018. Intervention was paper-based versus web-based interactive platform for FHH collection. Participant demographics, FHH detail, and risk assessment results were analyzed. 882 participants enrolled in the study, 481 in the paper-based group and 401 in the web-based group with mean (SD) age of 45.4 (12.98) years and 47.5% male. Web-based FHH collection participants had an increased number of conditions per relative (p-value <0.001), greater frequency of reporting age of onset (p-value <0.001), and greater odds of receiving ≥1 risk recommendation both overall (OR: 3.99 (2.41, 6.59)) and within subcategories of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer syndromes (p-value = 0.041) and screening and prevention for breast (p-value = 0.002) and colon cancer (p-value = 0.005). This has significant implications for clinical care and research efforts where FHH is being assessed. Using interactive information technology platforms to collect FHH can improve the completeness of the data collected and result in increased rates of risk identification. Methods of data collection to maximize benefit should be taken into account in future studies and clinical care.

Keywords: Data accuracy; Family health history; Health risk assessment; Preventive health services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antoniou A.C., Casadei S., Heikkinen T. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371(6):497–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australia Familial Risk Assessment – Breast and Ovarian Cancer. https://canceraustralia.gov.au/clinical-best-practice/gynaecological-can..., 2018.
    1. Beadles C.A., Ryanne Wu.R., Himmel T. Providing patient education: impact on quantity and quality of family health history collection. Fam. Cancer. 2014;13(2):325–332. - PubMed
    1. Begg C.B. On the use of familial aggregation in population-based case probands for calculating penetrance. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2002;94(16):1221–1226. - PubMed
    1. Bylstra Y., Davila S., Lim W.K. Implementation of genomics in medical practice to deliver precision medicine for an Asian population. NPJ Genomic Med. 2019;4(1):12. - PMC - PubMed