The Feasibility and Effectiveness of Web-Based Advance Care Planning Programs: Scoping Review
- PMID: 32181750
- PMCID: PMC7109619
- DOI: 10.2196/15578
The Feasibility and Effectiveness of Web-Based Advance Care Planning Programs: Scoping Review
Abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a process with the overall aim to enhance care in concordance with patients' preferences. Key elements of ACP are to enable persons to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these with family and health care professionals, and to document and review these if appropriate. ACP is usually conducted through personal conversations between a health care professional, a patient, and-if appropriate-family members. Although Web-based ACP programs have the potential to support patients in ACP, their effectiveness is unknown.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of Web-based, interactive, and person-centered ACP programs.
Methods: We systematically searched for quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating Web-based, interactive, and person-centered ACP programs in seven databases including EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar. Data on the characteristics of the ACP programs' content (using a predefined list of 10 key elements of ACP), feasibility, and effectiveness were extracted using a predesigned form.
Results: Of 3434 titles and abstracts, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating 11 Web-based ACP programs-10 were developed in the United States and one in Ireland. Studied populations ranged from healthy adults to patients with serious conditions. Programs typically contained the exploration of goals and values (8 programs), exploration of preferences for treatment and care (11 programs), guidance for communication about these preferences with health care professionals or relatives (10 programs), and the possibility to generate a document in which preferences can be recorded (8 programs). Reportedly, participants were satisfied with the ACP programs (11/11 studies), considering them as easy to use (8/8 studies) and not burdensome (7/8 studies). Designs of 13 studies allowed evaluating the effectiveness of five programs. They showed that ACP programs significantly increased ACP knowledge (8/8 studies), improved communication between patients and their relatives or health care professionals (6/6 studies), increased ACP documentation (6/6 studies), and improved concordance between care as preferred by the patients and the decisions of clinicians and health care representatives (2/3 studies).
Conclusions: Web-based, interactive, and person-centered ACP programs were mainly developed and evaluated in the United States. They contained the key elements of ACP, such as discussing and documenting goals and preferences for future care. As participants considered programs as easy to use and not burdensome, they appeared to be feasible. Among the 13 studies that measured the effectiveness of programs, improvement in ACP knowledge, communication, and documentation was reported. The concordance between preferred and received care is yet understudied. Studies with high-quality study designs in different health care settings are warranted to further establish the feasibility and effectiveness of Web-based ACP programs.
Keywords: Web-based intervention; advance care planning; chronic disease; decision aids; eHealth; health communication; patient education; patient-centered care.
©Doris van der Smissen, Anouk Overbeek, Sandra van Dulmen, Lisette van Gemert-Pijnen, Agnes van der Heide, Judith AC Rietjens, Ida J Korfage. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.03.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Rietjens JA, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, van der Heide A, Heyland DK, Houttekier D, Janssen DJ, Orsi L, Payne S, Seymour J, Jox RJ, Korfage IJ, European Association for Palliative Care Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543–51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jimenez G, Tan WS, Virk AK, Low CK, Car J, Ho AH. Overview of systematic reviews of advance care planning: summary of evidence and global lessons. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):436–59.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0885-3924(18)30283-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006 Nov;3(11):e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
